Back

Assessing Environmental RNAi in a Non-Model Organism

Mondal, M.; Peter, J.; Scarbrough, O.; Flynt, A. S.

2019-11-30 bioinformatics
10.1101/860338 bioRxiv
Show abstract

RNA interference (RNAi) regulates gene expression in most multicellular organisms through binding of small RNA effectors to target transcripts. Exploiting this process is a popular strategy for genetic manipulation in invertebrates and has applications that includes control of pests. Successful RNAi technologies are dependent on delivery method. The most convenient method is likely feeding which is effective in some animals while others are insensitive. Thus, there is a need to develop RNAi technology on a per-species basis, which will require a comprehensive approach for assessing small RNA production from synthetic nucleic acids. Using a biochemical and sequencing approaches we investigated the metabolism of ingested RNAs using the two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae, as a model for RNAi insensitivity. This chelicerae arthropod shows only modest response to oral RNAi and has biogenesis pathways distinct from model organisms. To identify RNAi substrates in T. urticae we characterized processing of synthetic RNAs and those derived from plant transcripts ingested during feeding. Through characterization of read size length and overlaps of small RNA reads, visualization methods were developed that facilitate distinguish trans-acting small RNAs from degradation fragments. Using a strategy that delineates small RNA classes, we found a variety of RNA species are gated into spider mite RNAi pathways, however, potential mature trans-acting RNAs appear very unstable and rare. This suggests spider mite RNAi pathway products that originate as ingested materials may be preferentially metabolized instead of converted into regulators of gene expression. Spider mites infest a variety of plants, and it would be maladaptive to generate diverse gene regulators from dietary RNAs. This study provides a framework for assessing RNAi technology in organisms where genetic and biochemical tools are absent and benefit rationale design of RNAi triggers.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 5%
10.6%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 21%
8.6%
3
Insect Molecular Biology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.6%
4
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.4%
5
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.2%
6
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.0%
7
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.7%
8
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
9
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.8%
50% of probability mass above
10
Gigabyte
60 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
11
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
12
Journal of Bioinformatics and Systems Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
13
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
214 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
RNA
169 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
Insects
36 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
16
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
17
Environmental DNA
49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
18
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
19
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
20
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.9%
22
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.9%
23
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.8%
24
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
25
RNA Biology
70 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
26
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
27
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.8%
28
Open Biology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
29
Pest Management Science
32 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
30
Journal of General Virology
46 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%