A machine learning based approach to the segmentation of micro CT data in archaeological and evolutionary sciences
O'Mahoney, T.; McKnight, L.; Lowe, T.; Dunn, J.; Mednikova, M.
Show abstract
Segmentation of high-resolution tomographic data is often an extremely time-consuming task and until recently, has usually relied upon researchers manually selecting materials of interest slice by slice. With the exponential rise in datasets being acquired, this is clearly not a sustainable workflow. In this paper, we apply the Trainable Weka Segmentation (a freely available plugin for the multiplatform program ImageJ) to typical datasets found in archaeological and evolutionary sciences. We demonstrate that Trainable Weka Segmentation can provide a fast and robust method for segmentation and is as effective as other leading-edge machine learning segmentation techniques.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A New Straightforward Method for Automated Segmentation of Trabecular Bone from Cortical Bone in Diverse and Challenging Morphologies 97%
- A new tool for 3D segmentation of computed tomography data: Drishti Paint and its applications 96%
- New Interactive Machine Learning Tool for Marine Image Analysis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- 3D virtual Histopathology of Cardiac Tissue from Covid-19 Patients based on Phase-Contrast X-ray Tomography 92%
- Machine learning of dissection photographs and surface scanning for quantitative 3D neuropathology 90%
- Improving a probabilistic cytoarchitectonic atlas of auditory cortex using a novel method for inter-individual alignment 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Geometric variation of the human tibia-fibula: A public dataset of tibia-fibula surface meshes and statistical shape model 95%
- Estimating body volumes and surface areas of animalsfrom cross-sections 91%
- Assessing tooth wear progression in primates: A longitudinal study using intraoral scanning technology 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.