Back

The effect of single-task training on learning transfer to a novel bimanual task

Hadi, Z.; Shakeel, A.; Ahmad, H.; Anwar, M. N.; Navid, M. S.

2019-11-29 neuroscience
10.1101/858217 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe contextual interference effect suggests that the random practice of multiple-tasks is more beneficial for the retention and transfer of the learning as compared to blocked practice. Therefore, the transfer of learning is usually attributed to the contextual interference effect and is studied in a multi-task setting. ObjectiveThe goals of this study were to evaluate whether the transfer of learning (i) can occur when a single bimanual task is practiced, (ii) is affected by the knowledge of results (feedback), and (iii) sustains over an extended number of trials. MethodsFifty-two healthy subjects were equally divided into four groups. Before the transfer test, two groups practiced a bimanual finger-tapping task with feedback (EF) and without feedback (ENF). The third group (IM) practiced the same task using the kinesthetic motor imagery, whereas the last group acted as a control (CTRL) and performed only a bimanual button-pressing task used for the transfer test. ResultsLinear mixed-model showed that in the transfer test, groups EF, ENF and IM had similar performance but significantly higher scores compared to the CTRL group. Compared to the CTRL, the EF and IM groups showed significantly improved performance in most of the sessions but group ENF had similar results. ConclusionThis study suggests that the single-task practice of a discrete bimanual task can facilitate the learning transfer to a novel task and knowledge of results (feedback) have no significant impact on the transfer of learning. Moreover, the transfer of learning effect does not disappear in extended trials. HighlightsO_LISingle-task practice of a discrete bimanual task can facilitate the learning of a novel bimanual task C_LIO_LIKnowledge of results (feedback) does not improve learning transfer in single-task setting C_LIO_LITransfer of learning effect does not disappear in extended trials C_LI

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.