Kidney Function and Blood Pressure: A Bi-directional Mendelian Randomisation Study
Yu, Z.; Coresh, J.; Qi, G.; Grams, M.; Boerwinkle, E.; Snieder, H.; Teumer, A.; Pattaro, C.; Kottgen, A.; Chatterjee, N.; Tin, A.
Show abstract
ObjectiveTo evaluate the bi-directional causal relation between kidney function and blood pressure. DesignMendelian randomisation study. SettingWe performed two-sample Mendelian randomisation analyses. Genetic instruments of kidney function traits were selected from summary statistics of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of glomerular filtration rate estimated from serum creatinine (eGFRcr) and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and were required to be associated with both eGFRcr and BUN to ensure that the instruments were more likely to represent the underlying kidney function. Genetic instruments of blood pressure were selected from summary statistics of GWAS of systolic and diastolic blood pressure. We investigated Mendelian randomisation hypothesis using several alternative approaches, including methods that are most robust to the presence of horizontal pleiotropy. ParticipantsThe summary statistics of eGFRcr included 567,460 participants from 54 cohorts, and the summary statistics of BUN included 243,031 participants from 48 cohorts from the Chronic Kidney Disease Genetics (CKDGen) Consortium. The summary statistics of systolic and diastolic blood pressure included 757,601 participants from the UK Biobank and 78 cohorts from the International Consortium for Blood Pressure (ICBP). ResultsSignificant evidence supported the causal effects of higher kidney function on lower blood pressure with multiple methods. Based on the mode-based Mendelian randomisation analysis approach, known for its robustness to the presence of pleiotropic effect, the effect estimate for 1 SD higher in eGFRcr was -0.17 SD unit (95 % CI: -0.09 to -0.24) in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and -0.15 SD unit (95% CI: -0.07 to -0.22) in diastolic blood pressure (DBP). In contrast, the causal effects of blood pressure on kidney function were not statistically significant. ConclusionsMendelian randomisation analyses support causal effects of higher kidney function on lower blood pressure. These results suggest preventing kidney function decline can reduce the public health burden of hypertension.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Genome-wide characterization of 54 urinary metabolites reveals molecular impact of kidney function 95%
- A multi-ethnic polygenic risk score is associated with hypertension prevalence and progression throughout adulthood 94%
- Genetic correlates of vitamin D-binding protein and 25 hydroxyvitamin D in neonatal dried blood spots 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Heterogeneous treatment effects of intensive glycemic control on kidney microvascular outcomes in ACCORD 94%
- Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential contributes to accelerated chronic kidney disease progression 94%
- Prognostic Utility of Total Kidney Volume for Chronic Kidney Disease Risk Prediction: An Observational and Mendelian Randomization Study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identification Of Modifier Gene Variants Overrepresented In Familial Hypomagnesemia With Hypercalciuria And Nephrocalcinosis Patients With A More Aggressive Renal Phenotype 93%
- Gene-vegetarianism interactions in calcium, testosterone, and eGFR identified in genome-wide analysis across 30 biomarkers 93%
- Assortative mating and within-spouse pair comparisons 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Composite trait Mendelian Randomization reveals distinct metabolic and lifestyle consequences of differences in body shape 92%
- Capturing additional genetic risk from family history for improved polygenic risk prediction 92%
- Genome-wide meta-analysis of iron status biomarkers and the effect of iron on all-cause mortality in HUNT 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.