Single Cell RNA Sequencing Reveals Heterogeneity of Human MSC Chondrogenesis: Lasso Regularized Logistic Regression to Identify Gene and Regulatory Signatures
Huynh, N. P.; Kelly, N. H.; Katz, D. B.; Pham, M.; Guilak, F.
Show abstract
Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) exhibit the potential to undergo chondrogenesis in vitro, forming de novo tissues with a cartilage-like extracellular matrix that is rich in glycosaminoglycan and collagen type II. However, it is now apparent that MSCs comprise an inhomogeneous population of cells, and the fate of individual subpopulations during this differentiation process is not well understood. We analyzed the trajectory of MSC differentiation during chondrogenesis using single cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq). Using a machine learning technique - lasso regularized logistic regression - we showed that multiple subpopulations of cells existed at all stages during MSC chondrogenesis and were better-defined by transcription factor activity rather than gene expression. Trajectory analysis indicated that subpopulations of MSCs were not intrinsically specified or restricted, but instead remained multipotent and could differentiate into three main cell types: cartilage, hypertrophic cartilage, and bone. Lasso regularized logistic regression showed several advances in scRNA-seq analysis, namely identification of a small number of highly influential genes or transcription factors for downstream validation, and cell type classification with high accuracy. Additionally, we showed that MSC differentiation trajectory may exhibit donor to donor variation, although key influential pathways were comparable between donors. Our data provide an important resource to study gene expression and to deconstruct gene regulatory networks in MSC differentiation.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Hypertrophic Chondrocytes Serve as a Reservoir for Marrow Associated Skeletal Stem and Progenitor Cells, Osteoblasts, and Adipocytes During Skeletal Development 95%
- Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals cellular and molecular heterogeneity in fibrocartilaginous enthesis formation 95%
- Single nuclei transcriptomics reveal the differentiation trajectories of periosteal skeletal/stem progenitor cells in bone regeneration 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Induction of Muscle Regenerative Multipotent Stem Cells from Human Adipocytes by PDGF-AB and 5-Azacytidine. 96%
- Xenogeneic Skin Transplantation Promotes Angiogenesis and Tissue Regeneration Through Vitamin D-Activated Trem2+ Macrophages 94%
- Notch signaling blockade links transcriptome heterogeneity in quiescent neural stem cells with their reactivation routes and potential 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Neighbor-specific gene expression revealed from physically interacting cells during mouse embryonic development 93%
- Monosomy X in isogenic human iPSC-derived trophoblast model impacts expression modules preserved in human placenta 93%
- Variants in the SOX9 transactivation middle domain induce axial skeleton dysplasia and scoliosis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Basigin Links Altered Skeletal Stem Cell Lineage Dynamics with Glucocorticoid-induced Bone Loss and Impaired Angiogenesis 94%
- Chondrogenic Enhancer Landscape of Limb and Axial Skeleton Development 94%
- Complementing Muscle Regeneration: Fibro-Adipogenic Progenitor and Macrophage-Mediated Repair of Elderly Human Skeletal Muscle 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- BMP and NODAL Paracrine Signalling Regulate the Totipotent-like Cell State in Embryonic Stem Cells. 94%
- Mesenchymal stem cell subpopulations and their heterogeneity of response to inductions revealed by single-cell RNA-seq 94%
- Single-Cell Transcriptome Dynamics of the Autotaxin-Lysophosphatidic Acid Axis During Muscle Regeneration Reveal Proliferative Effects in Mesenchymal Fibro-Adipogenic Progenitors 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.