Quantifying the prevalence of assortative mating in a human population
Jaffe, K.
Show abstract
For the first time, empirical evidence allowed to construct the frequency distribution of a genetic relatedness index between the parents of about half a million individuals living in the UK. The results suggest that over 30% of the population is the product of parents mating assortatively. The rest is probably the offspring of parents matching the genetic composition of their partners randomly. High degrees of genetic relatedness between parents, i.e. extreme inbreeding, was rare. This result shows that assortative mating is likely to be highly prevalent in human populations. Thus, assuming only random mating among humans, as widely done in ecology and population genetic studies, is not an appropriate approximation to reality. The existence of assortative mating has to be accounted for. The results suggest the conclusion that both, assortative and random mating, are evolutionary stable strategies. This improved insight allows to better understand complex evolutionary phenomena, such as the emergence and maintenance of sex, the speed of adaptation, runaway adaptation, maintenance of cooperation, and many others in human and animal populations.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Integrating genomics and multivariate evolutionary quantitative genetics: A case study of multivariate constraints on sexual selection in Drosophila serrata 91%
- Using genomic prediction to detect microevolutionary change of a quantitative trait 91%
- Growth effects and the underlying genetic architecture of inbreeding depression in a wild raptor 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.