Back

Investigation of working memory networks for verbal and rhythmic stimuli

Hoddinott, J. D.; Schuit, D.; Grahn, J. A.

2019-11-20 neuroscience
10.1101/847038 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Auditory working memory is often conceived of as a unitary capacity, with memory for different auditory materials (syllables, pitches, rhythms) thought to rely on similar neural mechanisms. One spontaneous behavior observed in working memory studies is chunking. For example, individuals often recount digit sequences in groups, or chunks, of 3 to 4 digits, and this chunking improves performance. Chunking may also operate in musical rhythm, with beats acting as chunk boundaries for tones in rhythmic sequences. Similar to chunking, beat-based structure in rhythms also improves performance. Thus, beat processing may rely on the same mechanisms that underlie chunking of verbal material. The current fMRI study examined whether beat perception is a type of chunking, measuring brain responses to chunked and unchunked letter sequences relative to beat-based and nonbeat-based rhythmic sequences. Participants completed a sequence discrimination task, and comparisons between stimulus encoding, maintenance, and discrimination were made for both rhythmic and verbal sequences. Overall, rhythm and verbal working memory networks overlapped substantially. When comparing rhythmic and verbal conditions, rhythms activated basal ganglia, supplementary motor area, and anterior insula, compared to letter strings, during encoding and discrimination. Letter strings compared to rhythms activated bilateral auditory cortex during encoding, and parietal cortex, precuneus, and middle frontal gyri during discrimination. Importantly, there was a significant interaction in the basal ganglia during encoding: activation for beat-based rhythms was greater than for nonbeat-based rhythms, but verbal chunked and unchunked conditions did not differ. The significant interaction indicates that beat perception is not simply a case of chunking, suggesting a dissociation between beat processing and grouping mechanisms that warrants further exploration.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.1%
2
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.6%
50% of probability mass above
3
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 2%
8.4%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 18%
6.4%
5
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.6%
6
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 29%
1.9%
7
Cortex
102 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
8
Brain Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
9
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
10
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
11
Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
12
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
13
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.3%
14
Cerebral Cortex
357 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
15
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.0%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 63%
1.0%
17
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.0%
18
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
19
Neurobiology of Aging
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
20
Cognition
44 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
21
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
22
Brain and Language
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.6%
23
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.6%