Back

Investigation of working memory networks for verbal and rhythmic stimuli

Hoddinott, J. D.; Schuit, D.; Grahn, J. A.

2019-11-20 neuroscience
10.1101/847038 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Auditory working memory is often conceived of as a unitary capacity, with memory for different auditory materials (syllables, pitches, rhythms) thought to rely on similar neural mechanisms. One spontaneous behavior observed in working memory studies is chunking. For example, individuals often recount digit sequences in groups, or chunks, of 3 to 4 digits, and this chunking improves performance. Chunking may also operate in musical rhythm, with beats acting as chunk boundaries for tones in rhythmic sequences. Similar to chunking, beat-based structure in rhythms also improves performance. Thus, beat processing may rely on the same mechanisms that underlie chunking of verbal material. The current fMRI study examined whether beat perception is a type of chunking, measuring brain responses to chunked and unchunked letter sequences relative to beat-based and nonbeat-based rhythmic sequences. Participants completed a sequence discrimination task, and comparisons between stimulus encoding, maintenance, and discrimination were made for both rhythmic and verbal sequences. Overall, rhythm and verbal working memory networks overlapped substantially. When comparing rhythmic and verbal conditions, rhythms activated basal ganglia, supplementary motor area, and anterior insula, compared to letter strings, during encoding and discrimination. Letter strings compared to rhythms activated bilateral auditory cortex during encoding, and parietal cortex, precuneus, and middle frontal gyri during discrimination. Importantly, there was a significant interaction in the basal ganglia during encoding: activation for beat-based rhythms was greater than for nonbeat-based rhythms, but verbal chunked and unchunked conditions did not differ. The significant interaction indicates that beat perception is not simply a case of chunking, suggesting a dissociation between beat processing and grouping mechanisms that warrants further exploration.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
135 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.9%
2
Cerebral Cortex
396 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
10.5%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 29%
5.4%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 17%
5.4%
50% of probability mass above
5
Journal of Neurophysiology
302 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
4.3%
6
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.0%
7
European Journal of Neuroscience
189 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.2%
8
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.2%
9
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
77 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.1%
10
Neuropsychologia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.7%
11
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 19%
2.7%
12
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
Cortex
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
14
Cerebral Cortex Communications
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
15
npj Science of Learning
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
16
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.0%
17
Psychophysiology
77 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
18
Brain and Language
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
19
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
20
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
21
Behavioural Brain Research
77 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%