Back

LESSeq: Local event-based analysis of alternative splicing using RNA-Seq data

Leng, J.; Cameron, C. J.; Oh, S.; Khurana, E.; Noonan, J. P.; Gerstein, M. B.

2019-11-14 bioinformatics
10.1101/841494 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Alternative splicing, which can be observed genome-wide by RNA-Seq, is important in cellular development and evolution. Comparative RNA-Seq experiments between different cellular conditions allow alternative splicing signatures to be detected. However, inferring alternative splicing signatures from short-read technology is unreliable and still presents many challenges before biologically significant signatures may be identified. To enable the robust discovery of differential alternative splicing, we developed the Local Event-based analysis of alternative Splicing using RNA-Seq (LESSeq) pipeline. LESSeq utilizes information of local splicing events (i.e., the partial structures in genes where transcript-splicing patterns diverge) to identify unambiguous alternative splicing. In addition, LESSeq quantifies the abundance of these alternative events using Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) and provides their significance between different cellular conditions. The utility of LESSeq is demonstrated through two case studies relevant to human variation and evolution. Using an RNA-Seq data set of lymphoblastoid cell lines in two human populations, we examined within-species variation and discovered population-differential alternative splicing events. With an RNA-Seq data set of several tissues in human and rhesus macaque, we studied cross-species variation and identified lineage-differential alternative splicing events. LESSeq is implemented in C++ and R, and made publicly available on GitHub at: https://github.com/gersteinlab/LESSeq

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.