Back

Chimpanzee fibroblasts exhibit greater adherence and migratory phenotypes than human fibroblasts

Zintel, T. M.; Ducey, D.; Babbitt, C. C.

2019-11-13 evolutionary biology
10.1101/838755 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Background and objectivesPrevious work has identified that gene expression differences in cell adhesion pathways exist between humans and chimpanzees. Here, we used a comparative cell biology approach to assay interspecies differences in cell adhesion phenotypes in order to better understand the basic biological differences between species epithelial cells that may underly the organism-level differences we see in wound healing and cancer. MethodologyWe used skin fibroblast cell lines from humans and chimpanzees to assay cell adhesion and migration. We then utilized published RNA-Seq data from the same cell lines exposed to a cancer / wound-healing mimic to determine what gene expression changes may be corresponding to altered cellular adhesion dynamics between species. ResultsThe functional adhesion and migration assays revealed that chimpanzee fibroblasts adhered sooner and remained adherent for significantly longer and move into a "wound" at faster rate than human fibroblasts. The gene expression data suggest that the enhanced adhesive properties of chimpanzee fibroblasts may be due to chimpanzee fibroblasts exhibiting significantly higher expression of cell and focal adhesion molecule genes than human cells, both during a wound healing assay and at rest. Conclusions and implicationsChimpanzee fibroblasts exhibit stronger adhesion and greater cell migration than human fibroblasts. This may be due to divergent gene expression of focal adhesion and cell adhesion molecules, such as integrins, laminins, and cadherins, as well as ECM proteins like collagens. This is one of few studies demonstrating that these divergences in gene expression between closely related species can manifest in fundamental differences in cell biology. Our results provide better insight into species-specific cell biology phenotypes and how they may influence more complex traits, such as cancer metastasis and wound healing.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 7%
22.6%
2
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.3%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 4%
12.4%
50% of probability mass above
4
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.2%
5
Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
6
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
7
Developmental Biology
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
8
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
9
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
10
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
11
Evolutionary Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
12
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
13
The Anatomical Record
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
14
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
15
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
16
BMC Molecular and Cell Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
17
American Journal of Biological Anthropology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
18
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
19
Journal of Anatomy
27 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
20
American Journal of Primatology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
21
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.7%
22
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%