A random walk down personalized single-cell networks: predicting the response of any gene to any drug for any patient
Harikumar, H.; Quinn, T. P.; Rana, S.; Gupta, S.; Venkatesh, S.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe last decade has seen a major increase in the availability of genomic data. This includes expert-curated databases that describe the biological activity of genes, as well as high-throughput assays that measure gene expression in bulk tissue and single cells. Integrating these heterogeneous data sources can generate new hypotheses about biological systems. Our primary objective is to combine population-level drug-response data with patient-level single-cell expression data to predict how any gene will respond to any drug for any patient. MethodsWe take 2 approaches to benchmarking a "dual-channel" random walk with restart (RWR) for data integration. First, we evaluate how well RWR can predict known gene functions from single-cell gene co-expression networks. Second, we evaluate how well RWR can predict known drug responses from individual cell networks. We then present two exploratory applications. In the first application, we combine the Gene Ontology database with glioblastoma single cells from 5 individual patients to identify genes whose functions differ between cancers. In the second application, we combine the LINCS drug-response database with the same glioblastoma data to identify genes that may exhibit patient-specific drug responses. ConclusionsOur manuscript introduces two innovations to the integration of heterogeneous biological data. First, we use a "dual-channel" method to predict up-regulation and down-regulation separately. Second, we use individualized single-cell gene co-expression networks to make personalized predictions. These innovations let us predict gene function and drug response for individual patients. Taken together, our work shows promise that single-cell co-expression data could be combined in heterogeneous information networks to facilitate precision medicine.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Mining hidden knowledge: Embedding models of cause-effect relationships curated from the biomedical literature 96%
- The axes of biology: a novel axes-based network embedding paradigm to decipher the functional mechanisms of the cell. 96%
- Beyond synthetic lethality in large-scale metabolic and regulatory network models via genetic minimal intervention sets 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.