Back

Transcranial Near-Infrared Light: Dose-Dependent Effects on EEG Oscillations but not Cerebral Blood Flow

Spera, V.; Sitnikova, T.; Ward, M. J.; farzam, p.; Hughes, J. W.; Bui, E.; maiello, m.; Taboada, L. D.; Hamblin, M. R.; Franceschini, M. A.; Cassano, P.

2019-11-12 neuroscience
10.1101/837591 bioRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveOur objective was to assess whether transcranial photobiomodulation (tPBM) with near-infrared light (NIR) shows modulatory effects on cerebral electrical activity through electroencephalogram (EEG) and cerebral blood flow (CBF). BackgroundtPBM has emerged as a novel intervention for several neuropsychiatric conditions due to its neuroprotective and neuroenhancement effects. MethodsWe conducted a single-blind, sham-controlled pilot study to test the effect of continuous (c-tPBM), pulse (p-tPBM) and sham (s-tPBM) transcranial photobiomodulation on EEG oscillations and CBT using diffuse correlation spectroscopy (DCS) in a sample of ten healthy subjects [6 F/ 4 M; mean age 28.6 {+/-} 12.9 (SD) years]. c-tPBM NIR (830 nm; 54.8 mW/cm{superscript 2}; 65.8 J/cm{superscript 2}; 2.3 kJ) and p-tPBM (830 nm; 10Hz; 54.8 mW/cm{superscript 2}; 33%; 21.7 J/cm{superscript 2}; 0.8 kJ) were delivered concurrently to the frontal areas (F4, Fp2, Fp1, F3 - total surface 35.8 cm{superscript 2}) by four LED clusters (TPBM-1000 Litecure). EEG and DCS recordings were performed weekly before, during, and after each tPBM session (in sequence: c-tPBM, s-tPBM and p-tPBM). ResultsOnly c-tPBM significantly boosted gamma (t = 3.02, df = 7, p < .02) and beta (t = 2.91, df = 7, p < .03) EEG spectral powers in eyes-open recordings and gamma power (t = 3.61, df = 6, p < .015) in eyes-closed recordings, with the largest effects in the posterior regions. There was no significant effect of NIR-tPBM on CBF compared to sham. ConclusionsOur data suggest a dose-dependent effect of tPBM with NIR (c-tPBM) on cerebral gamma and beta neuronal activity. Altogether, our findings support the neuromodulatory effect of transcranial NIR.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.