Back

Nascent RNA sequencing of peripheral blood leukocytes reveal gene expression diversity

Kim, S. S.-Y.; Dziubek, A.; Lee, S. A.; Kwak, H.

2019-11-09 molecular biology
10.1101/836841 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Nascent RNA sequencing is a powerful method to measure transcription with high resolution, sensitivity, and directional information, which gives distinctive information about transcription from other methods such as chromatin immunoprecipitation or mRNA sequencing. We present an integrated package of nascent RNA-seq methods - ultrafast Precision Run On (uPRO) combined with computational procedures to discover cell type specific enhancers, promoters, and transcription factor networks. uPRO is composed of adaptor ligation and reverse transcription reactions, which is reduced to a one-day procedure and makes nascent RNA-seq more feasible and flexible for a widespread use. We generated genome-wide profiles of nascent transcription in human blood derived cell lines and clinical samples of ~1 ml of untreated whole blood. We integrated these data into deep learning and hierarchical network analysis to detect enhancers, promoters, and co-expression networks to define cell-type specific transcription programs. We found conservation of position but variation of expression in cell type specific enhancers and transcription start sites. Transcription factors (TFs) such as TCF-3 and OCT1 were pivotally associated with TF-enhancer-gene networks across cell types. Intriguingly, we also discovered that TFs related to cell stress and inflammation - such as SRF, ATF, CHOP, and NF-kB - are associated with inter-individual variation of leukocyte transcription in whole blood. Our integration of experimental and computational nascent RNA methods will provide an efficient strategy to identify specific transcriptional programs, both in cell-type and patient/disease-associated, with minimal sample requirements.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.