Structure of the cell-binding component of the Clostridium difficile binary toxin reveals a novel macromolecular assembly
Xu, X.; Ruiz, R.; Adipietro, K. A.; Peralta, C.; Ben-Hail, D.; Varney, K. M.; Cook, M. E.; Roth, B. M.; Wilder, P. T.; Cleveland, T.; Grishaev, A.; Neu, H.; Michel, S.; Yu, W.; Beckett, D.; Rustandi, R. R.; Lancaster, C.; Loughney, J. W.; Krsitopeit, A.; Christanti, S.; Olson, J. W.; MacKerell, A. D.; des Georges, A.; Pozharski, E.; Weber, D. J.
Show abstract
Targeting Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is challenging because treatment options are limited, and high recurrence rates are common. One reason for this is that hypervirulent CDI often has a binary toxin termed the C. difficile toxin (CDT), in addition to the enterotoxins TsdA and TsdB. CDT has an enzymatic component, termed CDTa, and a pore-forming or delivery subunit termed CDTb. CDTb was characterized here using a combination of single particle cryoEM, X-ray crystallography, NMR, and other biophysical methods. In the absence of CDTa, two novel di-heptamer structures for activated CDTb (aCDTb; 1.0 MDa) were solved at atomic resolution including a symmetric (SymCDTb; 3.14 [A]) and an asymmetric form (AsymCDTb; 2.84 [A]). Roles played by two receptor-binding domains of aCDTb were of particular interest since RBD1 lacks sequence homology to any other known toxin, and the RBD2 domain is completely absent in other well-studied heptameric toxins (i.e. anthrax). For AsymCDTb, a novel Ca2+ binding site was discovered in RBD1 that is important for its stability, and RBD2 was found to be critical for host cell toxicity and the novel di-heptamer fold for both forms of aCDTb. Together, these studies represent a starting point for structure-based drug-discovery strategies to targeting CDT in the most severe strains of CDI. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENTThere is a high burden from C. difficile infection (CDI) throughout the world, and the Center for Disease Control (CDC) reports more than 500,000 cases annually in the United States, resulting in an estimated 15,000 deaths. In addition to the large clostridial toxins, TcdA/TcdB, a third C. difficile binary toxin (CDT) is associated with the most serious outbreaks of drug resistant CDI in the 21st century. Here, structural biology and biophysical approaches were used to characterize the cell binding component of CDT, termed CDTb, at atomic resolution. Surprisingly, two novel structures were solved from a single sample that help to explain the molecular underpinnings of C. difficile toxicity. These structures will also be important for targeting this human pathogen via structure-based therapeutic design methods.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Definition of a saxitoxin (STX) binding code enables discovery and characterization of the Anuran saxiphilin family 96%
- A tripartite cytolytic toxin formed by Vibrio cholerae proteins with flagellum-facilitated secretion 95%
- Employing NaChBac for cryo-EM analysis of toxin action on voltage-gated Na+ channels in nanodisc 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Structure and ion-release mechanism of PIB-4-type ATPases 96%
- Structural insight into the dual function of LbpB in mediating Neisserial pathogenesis 95%
- Structural characterization and dynamics of AdhE ultrastructures from Clostridium thermocellum: A containment strategy for toxic intermediates. 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Molecular architecture and domain arrangement of the placental malaria protein VAR2CSA suggests a model for receptor binding 95%
- The structure of the monobactam-producing thioesterase domain of SulM forms a unique complex with the upstream carrier protein domain 95%
- An integrated approach unravels a crucial structural property for the function of the insect steroidogenic Halloween protein Noppera-bo 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.