Influence of stimulus complexity on the specificity of visual perceptual learning
Bakhtiari, S.; Awada, A.; Pack, C.
Show abstract
Although the structure and function of the human visual system are determined in large part during early development, there is ample evidence for adult plasticity as well. Such plasticity has important consequences for restoring vision after cortical damage and for improving function in healthy people. Although these applications have shown promising results, they are often limited by pathological specificity: Improvements obtained through perceptual training fail to generalize beyond the trained stimulus feature or location. Efforts to reduce specificity have focused on the design of training tasks, but less is known about the effects of stimulus structure on the specificity of perceptual learning. Here, we leverage physiological findings from the dorsal visual pathway of the primate brain to explore the hypothesis that learning specificity is related to the complexity of the training stimulus. Specifically, because neurons in higher-level structures of the dorsal visual pathway exhibit little stimulus specificity, we reasoned that training with more complex stimuli would reduce the specificity of learning. We trained human observers on stimuli of varying complexity, ranging from simple sinewave gratings to complex optic flow fields. Our results show that training with more complex stimuli reduces specificity for spatial position and stimulus features. Such changes are associated with increased spatial integration. These findings were captured by a computational \"reweighting\" model that decoded the outputs of simulated neurons in areas MT and MST of the primate visual cortex. Our results suggest that the addition of more complex stimuli into perceptual learning paradigms provides a simple and effective way to minimize specificity in learning.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Asymmetric stimulus representations bias visual perceptual learning 97%
- Exploring and explaining properties of motion processing in biological brains using a neural network 96%
- Continuous psychophysics shows millisecond-scale visual processing delays are faithfully preserved in movement dynamics 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Gain, not concomitant changes in spatial receptive field properties, improves task performance in a neural network attention model 97%
- A Bayesian and efficient observer model explains concurrent attractive and repulsive history biases in visual perception 96%
- A general decoding strategy explains the relationship between behavior and correlated variability 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Spatial arrangement drastically changes the neural representation of multiple visual stimuli that compete in more than one feature domain 96%
- Detecting object boundaries in natural images requires 'incitatory' cell-cell interactions 96%
- Recent visual experience reshapes V4 neuronal activity and improves perceptual performance 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Similar masking effects of natural backgrounds on detection performances in humans, macaques, and macaque-V1 population responses 97%
- Contrast gain control is a reparameterization of a population response curve 95%
- Visual feature tuning of superior colliculus neural reafferent responses after fixational microsaccades 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.