Back

Semi-supervised machine learning facilitates cell colocalization and tracking in intravital microscopy

Pizzagalli, D. U.; Thelen, M.; Gonzalez, S. F.; Krause, R.

2019-11-04 systems biology
10.1101/829838 bioRxiv
Show abstract

2-photon intravital microscopy (2P-IVM) is a key technique to investigate cell migration and cell-to-cell interactions in organs and tissues of living organisms. Focusing on immunology, 2P-IVM allowed recording videos of leukocytes during the immune response, highlighting unprecedented mechanisms of the immune system. However, the automatic analysis of the acquired videos remains challenging and poorly reproducible. In fact, both manual curation of results and tuning of bioimaging software parameters among different experiments, are required. One of the most difficult tasks for a user is transferring to a computer the knowledge on what a cell is and how it should appear with respect to the background, other objects, or other cell types. This is possibly due to the low specificity of acquisition channels which may include multiple cell populations and the presence of similar objects in the background. In this work, we propose a method based on semi-supervised machine learning to facilitate colocalization. In line with recently proposed approaches for pixel classification, the method requires the user to draw some lines on the cells of interest and some line on the other objects/background. These lines embed knowledge, not only on which pixel belongs to a class or which pixel belongs to another class but also on how pixels in the same object are connected. Hence, the proposed method exploits the information from the lines to create an additional imaging channel that is specific for the cells fo interest. The usage of this method increased tracking accuracy on a dataset of challenging 2P-IVM videos of leukocytes. Additionally, it allowed processing multiple samples of the same experiment keeping the same mathematical model.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biological Imaging
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.4%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 7%
10.1%
3
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.3%
4
Journal of Cell Science
353 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.9%
5
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.9%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.3%
7
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.9%
8
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
9
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 10%
3.6%
10
Biomedical Optics Express
84 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.7%
11
Journal of Biophotonics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
12
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
13
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
14
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
15
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.9%
16
Journal of Biomedical Optics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
17
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
18
Optics Express
23 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
19
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
20
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
21
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 51%
0.9%
22
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
23
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
24
Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology
54 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
25
Patterns
70 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
27
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
28
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
29
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
45 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
30
SoftwareX
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%