Back

Mechanical matching of implant to host minimises foreign body reaction

Carnicer-Lombarte, A.; Barone, D. G.; Dimov, I. B.; Hamilton, R. S.; Prater, M.; Zhao, X. X.; Rutz, A. L.; Malliaras, G. G.; Lacour, S. P.; Bryant, C. E.; Fawcett, J. W.; Franze, K.

2019-11-04 bioengineering
10.1101/829648 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Medical implants offer a unique and powerful therapeutic approach in many areas of medicine. However, their lifetime is often limited as they may cause a foreign body reaction (FBR) leading to their encapsulation by scar tissue1-4. Despite the importance of this process, how cells recognise implanted materials is still poorly understood5, 6. Here, we show how the mechanical mismatch between implants and host tissue leads to FBR. Fibroblasts and macrophages, which are both crucially involved in mediating FBR, became activated when cultured on materials just above the stiffness of healthy tissue. Coating stiff implants with a thin layer of hydrogel or silicone with a tissue-like elastic modulus ([~]20 kPa in subcutaneous and [~]2 kPa in peripheral nerve implants) or softer significantly reduced inflammation and fibrosis three months after implantation. Materials stiffer than the host tissue led to nuclear localisation of the mechanosensitive transcriptional regulator YAP in neighbouring cells in vivo, confirming mechanotransduction. The alleviation of FBR by soft coatings not exceeding the stiffness of the host tissue provides a strategy to achieve long-term implant stability without extensive modification of current implant manufacturing techniques, facilitating clinical translation.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.