Back

Profiling the effects of rifaximin on the healthy human colonic microbiota using a chemostat model

Moura, I. B.; Buckley, A. M.; Ewin, D.; Clark, E.; Mitra, S.; Wilcox, M. H.; Chilton, C. H.

2019-11-01 microbiology
10.1101/828269 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Rifaximin is a low solubility antibiotic with activity against a wide range of bacterial pathogens. It accumulates in the intestine and is suitable for prolonged use. Three chemostat models (A, B and C) were used to investigate the effects of three rifaximin formulations (, {beta} and {kappa}, respectively) on the gut microbiome. Bacterial populations were monitored by bacterial culture and 16S rRNA gene amplicon (16S) sequencing. Limited disruption of bacterial populations was observed for rifaximin , {beta} and {kappa}. All formulations caused declines in total spores ([~]2 log10 cfu ml-1), Enterococcus spp. ([~]2 log10 cfu ml-1 in models A and C, and [~]1 log10 cfu ml-1 in model B), and Bacteroides spp. populations ([~]3 log10 cfu ml-1 in models A and C, and [~]4 log10 cfu ml-1 in model B). Bacterial populations fully recovered during antibiotic dosing in model C, and before the end of the experiment in models A and B. According to the taxonomic analysis, prior to rifaximin exposure, Bifidobacteriaceae, Ruminococcaceae, Acidaminococcaceae, Lachnospiraceae and Rikenellaceae families represented >92% of the total relative abundance, in all models. Within these families, 15 bacterial genera represented >99% of the overall relative abundance. Overall, the 16S sequencing and culture data showed similar variations in the bacterial populations studied. Among the three formulations, rifaximin {kappa} appeared to have the least disruptive effect on the colonic microbiota, with culture populations showing recovery in a shorter period and the taxonomic analysis revealing the least global variation in relative abundance of prevalent groups.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Antibiotics
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
35.0%
2
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
167 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.5%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 22%
4.9%
4
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 42%
2.9%
7
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.8%
8
Microbial Biotechnology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
9
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.1%
10
BMC Microbiology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
11
npj Biofilms and Microbiomes
56 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.8%
12
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
13
Gut Microbes
70 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
14
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.4%
16
Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
17
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
18
Microbiome
139 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
19
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
20
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
21
Journal of Applied Microbiology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
22
Infection and Immunity
103 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
23
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.8%
24
International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
25
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
26
Med
38 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
27
Biofilm
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
28
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
29
Food & Function
12 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
30
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%