Molecules To Mankind: Bridging Laboratory And Population Training
Burke, R. M.; Gazmararian, J. A.; McCarty, N. A.; Rambo-Martin, B. L.; Shaw, K. A.
Show abstract
Aim/PurposeTodays biomedical researchers are expected to apply understanding of basic biology to improve human health. Meeting this goal requires mastery of both laboratory and population sciences, each of which has its own knowledge base, techniques, and training paradigms. BackgroundEmory Universitys "Molecules-to-Mankind" (M2M) doctoral pathway was established in 2009 to be an evolving model of interdisciplinary PhD education. M2M supplements fellows home programs, ensuring they receive training in both population and laboratory sciences. MethodologyThe present paper describes the M2M program in detail. Surveys of faculty and fellows were also carried out, and the results are presented herein. ContributionThe M2M program follows a unique model by which doctoral students receive training in both population and laboratory sciences. The present paper describes this model, such that the information can be disseminated to other educational institutions interested in implementing similar programs. FindingsThis unique model facilitates engagement of stakeholders including the fellows home program, dissertation advisor, and Emorys professional schools. Recruited across biomedical PhD and MD/PhD programs, fellows have diverse research experiences and represent "spokes" bound together by the M2M "hub." This hubs central feature is a weekly seminar class where fellows and faculty members gather for open discussion with interdisciplinary speakers with successful research careers, emphasizing speakers who have tied laboratory and population sciences in their own work. This forum provides an encouraging environment for dialogue on all aspects of biomedical research from the science itself, to the speakers career path, and the logistics of garnering institutional support and building transdisciplinary collaborations. A decade since its inception, M2M has a proven track record of shaping early-stage careers for its 49 alumni to date. Recommendations for PractitionersEngaging trainees outside their home doctoral programs can have positive implications on overall quality of education. Recommendation for ResearchersAs interdisciplinary models grow ever more important in biomedical sciences, it is important to further examine the best teaching methods for training the next generation of scientists. Impact on SocietyInterdisciplinary training at the doctoral level is important to produce future cohorts of engaged and versatile scientific leaders. Future ResearchFuture research should continue to explore novel methods of training graduate students at the doctoral level.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Using Stakeholder Insights to Enhance Engagement in PhD Professional Development 96%
- "When I talk about it, my eyes light up!" Impacts of a national laboratory internship on community college student success 95%
- A national professional development program fills mentoring gaps for postdoctoral researchers 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Flying in the Face of Adversity: A Drosophila-based Virtual CURE Provides Semester-long Authentic Research Opportunity to the Flipped Classroom. 97%
- PROPEL: a scalable model for postbaccalaureate training to promote diversity in the biomedical workforce 96%
- Remote Learning Barriers and Opportunities for Graduate Student and Postdoctoral Learners in Career and Professional Skill Development: A Case Study 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Implementation and Impact of a Diversity Supplement Repository 95%
- PREP-aring is worth it: Success of the Case Western Reserve University Post-baccalaureate Research Education Program and its Scholars 94%
- Emotional Distress, Stress, Anxiety and the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Early Career Women in Healthcare Sciences Research 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.