Back

Phylogeography of two Andean frogs: Test of vicariance versus elevational gradient models of diversification

Koscinski, D.; Handford, P.; Tubaro, P. L.; Li, P.; Lougheed, S. C.

2019-10-25 evolutionary biology
10.1101/819557 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The tropical and subtropical Andes have among the highest levels of biodiversity in the world. Understanding the forces that underlie speciation and diversification in the Andes is a major focus of research. Here we tested two hypotheses of species origins in the Andes: 1. Vicariance mediated by orogenesis or shifting habitat distribution. 2. Parapatric diversification along elevational environmental gradients. We also sought insights on the factors that impacted the phylogeography of co-distributed taxa, and the influences of divergent species ecology on population genetic structure. We used phylogeographic and coalescent analyses of nuclear and mitochondrial DNA sequence data to compare genetic diversity and evolutionary history of two frog species: Pleurodema borellii (Family: Leiuperidae, 130 individuals; 20 sites), and Hypsiboas riojanus (Family: Hyllidae, 258 individuals; 23 sites) across their shared range in northwestern Argentina. The two showed concordant phylogeographic structuring, and our analyses support the vicariance model over the elevational gradient model. However, Pleurodema borellii exhibited markedly deeper temporal divergence ([≥]4 Ma) than H. riojanus (1-2 Ma). The three main mtDNA lineages of P. borellii were nearly allopatric and diverged between 4-10 Ma. At similar spatial scales, differentiation was less in the putatively more habitat-specialized H. riojanus than in the more generalist P. borellii. Similar allopatric distributions of major lineages for both species implies common causes of historical range fragmentation and vicariance. However, different divergence times among clades presumably reflect different demographic histories, permeability of different historical barriers at different times, and/or difference in life history attributes and sensitivities to historical environmental change. Our research enriches our understanding of the phylogeography of the Andes in northwestern Argentina.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
19.1%
2
Journal of Biogeography
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.0%
3
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
8.6%
4
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
61 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
5
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.7%
7
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
8
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
9
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
10
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
11
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 35%
2.1%
12
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
13
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
14
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
15
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 30%
1.8%
16
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
17
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.7%
18
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
19
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
20
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.4%
21
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.1%
22
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.0%
23
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
24
American Journal of Botany
41 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
25
Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
26
Diversity and Distributions
26 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
27
Systematic Biology
121 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
28
Conservation Genetics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
29
Global Ecology and Biogeography
41 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
30
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 73%
0.5%