Back

Developmental variability drives mouse molar evolution along an evolutionary line of least resistance

HAYDEN, L.; LOCHOVSKA, K.; SEMON, M.; RENAUD, S.; DELIGNETTE-MULLER, M.-L.; VILCOT, M.; PETERKOVA, R.; HOVORAKOVA, M.; PANTALACCI, S.

2019-10-24 evolutionary biology
10.1101/818484 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Developmental systems may preferentially produce certain types of variation and, thereby, bias phenotypic evolution. This is a central issue in evolutionary developmental biology, albeit somewhat understudied. Here we focus on the shape of the first upper molar which shows a clear, repeated tendency for anterior elongation at different scales from within mouse populations to between species of the Mus genus. In contrast, the lower molar displays more evolutionary stability. We compared upper and lower molar development of mouse strains representative of this fine variation (DUHi: elongated molars and FVB: short molars). Using a novel quantitative approach to examine small-scale developmental variation, we identified temporal, spatial and functional differences in tooth signaling centers between the two strains, likely due to different tuning of the activation-inhibition mechanisms ruling signaling center patterning. Based on the spatio-temporal dynamics of signaling centers and their lineage tracing, we show an intrinsic difference in the fate of signaling centers between lower and upper jaw of both strains. This can explain why variations in activation-inhibition parameters between strains are turned into anterior elongation in the upper molar only. Finally, although the \"elongated\" DUHi strain was inbred, first molar elongation was variable in adults, and we found high levels of intra-strain developmental variation in upper molar development. This is consistent with the inherent developmental instability of the upper molar system enabling the morphological variability of the tooth phenotype.\n\nIn conclusion, we have uncovered developmental properties that underlie the molars capacity for repeated phenotypic change, or said differently, that underlie a \"line of least resistance\". By focusing on the developmental basis of fine phenotypic variation, our study also challenges some common assumptions and practices in developmental and evolutionary developmental biology.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Development
497 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
17.9%
2
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 4%
17.9%
3
Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.5%
4
Journal of Anatomy
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.1%
50% of probability mass above
5
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.1%
6
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 18%
5.3%
7
Evolution & Development
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
8
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
233 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
9
Disease Models & Mechanisms
119 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
10
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.8%
11
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.6%
12
Biology Open
156 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
13
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 33%
1.3%
14
Developmental Biology
150 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
15
BMC Biology
265 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
16
Molecular Biology and Evolution
542 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
17
BMC Ecology and Evolution
51 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.1%
18
Open Biology
106 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
19
Cells
249 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
20
GENETICS
483 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
21
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 55%
0.9%
22
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.8%
23
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.8%
24
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
25
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.8%