Back

Developmental variability drives mouse molar evolution along an evolutionary line of least resistance

HAYDEN, L.; LOCHOVSKA, K.; SEMON, M.; RENAUD, S.; DELIGNETTE-MULLER, M.-L.; VILCOT, M.; PETERKOVA, R.; HOVORAKOVA, M.; PANTALACCI, S.

2019-10-24 evolutionary biology
10.1101/818484 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Developmental systems may preferentially produce certain types of variation and, thereby, bias phenotypic evolution. This is a central issue in evolutionary developmental biology, albeit somewhat understudied. Here we focus on the shape of the first upper molar which shows a clear, repeated tendency for anterior elongation at different scales from within mouse populations to between species of the Mus genus. In contrast, the lower molar displays more evolutionary stability. We compared upper and lower molar development of mouse strains representative of this fine variation (DUHi: elongated molars and FVB: short molars). Using a novel quantitative approach to examine small-scale developmental variation, we identified temporal, spatial and functional differences in tooth signaling centers between the two strains, likely due to different tuning of the activation-inhibition mechanisms ruling signaling center patterning. Based on the spatio-temporal dynamics of signaling centers and their lineage tracing, we show an intrinsic difference in the fate of signaling centers between lower and upper jaw of both strains. This can explain why variations in activation-inhibition parameters between strains are turned into anterior elongation in the upper molar only. Finally, although the \"elongated\" DUHi strain was inbred, first molar elongation was variable in adults, and we found high levels of intra-strain developmental variation in upper molar development. This is consistent with the inherent developmental instability of the upper molar system enabling the morphological variability of the tooth phenotype.\n\nIn conclusion, we have uncovered developmental properties that underlie the molars capacity for repeated phenotypic change, or said differently, that underlie a \"line of least resistance\". By focusing on the developmental basis of fine phenotypic variation, our study also challenges some common assumptions and practices in developmental and evolutionary developmental biology.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.7%
2
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 5%
11.8%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 21%
6.0%
4
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.6%
5
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.6%
6
Evolutionary Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.6%
7
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.4%
8
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.4%
50% of probability mass above
9
Open Biology
95 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.4%
10
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.4%
11
Evolution & Development
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
12
Journal of Anatomy
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
13
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.3%
14
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.3%
15
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.3%
16
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 29%
2.0%
17
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
18
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
19
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
20
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
21
Developmental Biology
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
22
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
23
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.2%
24
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.2%
25
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
26
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
27
American Journal of Biological Anthropology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
28
Journal of Molecular Evolution
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
29
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.7%
30
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%