Back

Circumvention of common labeling artifacts using secondary nanobodies

Sograte-Idrissi, S.; Schlichthaerle, T.; Duque-Alfonso, C. J.; Alevra, M.; Strauss, S.; Moser, T.; Jungmann, R.; Rizzoli, S. O.; Opazo, F.

2019-10-25 cell biology Community evaluation
10.1101/818351 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The most common procedure to reveal the location of specific (sub)cellular elements in biological samples is via immunostaining followed by optical imaging. This is typically performed with target-specific primary antibodies (1.Abs), which are revealed by fluorophore-conjugated secondary antibodies (2.Abs). However, at high resolution this methodology can induce a series of artifacts due to the large size of antibodies, their bivalency, and their polyclonality. Here we use STED and DNA-PAINT super-resolution microscopy or light sheet microscopy on cleared tissue to show how monovalent secondary reagents based on camelid single-domain antibodies (nanobodies; 2.Nbs) attenuate these artifacts. We demonstrate that monovalent 2.Nbs have four additional advantages: 1) they increase localization accuracy with respect to 2.Abs; 2) they allow direct pre-mixing with 1.Abs before staining, reducing experimental time, and enabling the use of multiple 1.Abs from the same species; 3) they penetrate thick tissues efficiently; and 4) they avoid the artificial clustering seen with 2.Abs both in live and in poorly fixed samples. Altogether, this suggests that 2.Nbs are a valuable alternative to 2.Abs, especially when super-resolution imaging or staining of thick tissue samples are involved.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Microscopy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.9%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 9%
8.5%
3
Journal of Cell Biology
333 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.9%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.9%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.9%
6
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 19%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
Journal of Cell Science
353 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.0%
8
Optica
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.0%
9
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
10
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.9%
11
Journal of Structural Biology
58 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
12
Light: Science & Applications
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
13
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
Biomedical Optics Express
84 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
15
Journal of Biophotonics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
16
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
17
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
18
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
19
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
20
Microscopy and Microanalysis
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
21
Optics Express
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
22
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.8%
23
Biophysical Reports
36 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
24
Journal of Structural Biology: X
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
25
BMC Methods
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
26
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
27
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.7%
28
Life Science Alliance
263 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
Nano Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
30
Cytometry Part A
30 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%