Exploration of the role of CHRNA5-A3-B4 genotype in smoking behaviours
Lassi, G.; Mahedy, L.; Oliveira, A. S. F.; Dyer, M. L.; Drax, K.; Dawkins, L.; Rennard, S.; Matcham, J.; Timpson, N. J.; Eisen, T.; Munafo, M. R.
Show abstract
Genome-wide association studies have identified associations between variation at rs16969968/rs1051730 in the CHRNA5-A3-B4 gene cluster and smoking related outcomes. Experiments in rodents have described the nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) subunits encoded by this gene cluster and showed a lack of nicotine aversion in nAChRs deficient animal models. We conducted a nicotine challenge and a smoking topography study in humans, hypothesising that: 1. responses to a nicotine challenge would differ according to the rs16969968/rs1051730 genotype and 2. genotype may influence nicotine intake via smoking topography.\n\nWe used linear regressions to examine associations between rs16969968/rs1051730 genotype and subjective (questionnaires) and objective (physiological parameters) responses following acute nicotine exposure in never smokers (hypothesis 1) or cigarette smoking in current smokers (hypothesis 2). There was evidence to suggest nicotine exposure increases blood pressure and heart rate, and negatively affects mood, but insufficient evidence that these effects differ by genotype. Carriers of the minor allele following smoking one cigarette, exhibited reduced cravings (b=-2.46, 95% CI -4.87 to - 0.06, p=0.04) and inhaled less smoke per cigarette (b=-0.24, 95% CI - 0.43 to - 0.06, p=0.01) and per puff (b=-0.18, 95% CI -0.32 to -0.01, p=0.02). These results suggest that we need to carefully consider the translational value of the findings of aversion behaviour in nAChRs rodent models, and that deeper inhalation does not explain the strong association between rs16969968/rs1051730 genotype and objective biomarkers of tobacco exposure.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The role of a priori-identified addiction and smoking gene sets in smoking behaviors. 95%
- Little Evidence of Modified Genetic Effect of rs16969968 on Heavy Smoking Based on Age of Onset of Smoking 94%
- E-cigarettes With Varenicline Versus Varenicline for Smoking Cessation: A Pragmatic Randomised Controlled Trial 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Nicotine dependence (trait) and acute nicotinic stimulation (state) modulate attention but not cognitive control: converging fMRI evidence from Go-Nogo and Flanker tasks 92%
- Genome-wide DNA methylation differences in nucleus accumbens of smokers vs. nonsmokers 91%
- Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) impairs visual working memory performance 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Trends in daily cigarette consumption among smokers: a population study in England, 2008-2023 94%
- Varenicline Versus Cytisine for Smoking Cessation in a Primary Care Setting: A Randomized Controlled Trial 92%
- Are the relevant risk factors being adequately captured in empirical studies of smoking initiation? A machine learning analysis based on the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The effects of reduced nicotine content cigarettes in smokers with mood or anxiety disorders: a double-blind randomized trial 95%
- Investigating the added value of biomarkers compared with self-reported smoking in predicting future e-cigarette use: Evidence from a longitudinal UK cohort study 95%
- Tobacco, nicotine, and cannabis use and exposure in an Australian Indigenous population during pregnancy: A protocol to measure parental and foetal exposure and outcomes 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Daily and Intermittent Smoking Decrease Gray Matter Volume and Concentrations of Glutamate, Creatine, Myo-Inositol and N-acetylaspartate in the Prefrontal Cortex 93%
- Disentangling craving- and valence-driven brain responses to smoking cues in individuals with nicotine use disorder 93%
- Genetic liability for substance use associated with medical comorbidities in electronic health records of African- and European-ancestry individuals 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.