Back

Autoimmunity Risk Gene IRGM is a Master Negative Regulator of Interferon Response by Controlling the Activation of cGAS STING and RIG-I-MAVS Signaling Pathways

Jena, K. K.; Mehto, S.; Nath, P.; Chauhan, N. R.; Sahu, R.; Nayak, T. K.; Das, S. K.; Dhar, K.; Sahoo, P. K.; Murmu, K. C.; De, S.; Datey, A.; Prasad, P.; Chattopadhyay, S.; Chauhan, S.; Chauhan, S.

2019-10-22 immunology
10.1101/815506 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Activation of type 1 interferon response is extensively connected with the antiviral immunity and pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases. Here, we found that IRGM, whose deficiency is linked with the genesis of several autoimmune disorders, is a master negative regulator of the interferon response. Mechanistically, we show that IRGM interacts with nucleic acid sensor proteins, including cGAS and RIG-I, and mediates their autophagic degradation to restrain activation of interferon signaling. Further, IRGM maintains mitophagy flux, and its deficiency results in the accumulation of defunct leaky mitochondria that releases cytosolic DAMPs triggering activation of interferon responses via cGAS-STING and RIG-I-MAVS signaling axis. Due to an enduring type 1 IFN response in IRGM-deficient cells and mice, they were intrinsically resistant to infection of the Japanese Encephalitis virus, Herpes Simplex virus, and Chikungunya virus. Altogether, this study defines the molecular mechanisms by which IRGM maintains interferon homeostasis and protects from autoimmune diseases. Further, it identifies IRGM as a broad therapeutic target for defense against viruses.\n\nGraphical Abstract\n\nO_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=126 SRC=\"FIGDIR/small/815506v1_ufig1.gif\" ALT=\"Figure 1\">\nView larger version (48K):\norg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1d4822org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@6aebbcorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@19a9b72org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1539195_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.