Back

Using genetics to differentiate patients with similar symptoms: application to inflammatory arthritis in the rheumatology outpatient clinic

Knevel, R.; le Cessie, S.; Terao, C.; Slowikowski, K.; Cui, J.; Huizinga, T.; Costenbader, K.; Liao, K.; Karlson, E.; Raychaudhuri, S.

2019-10-22 genetics
10.1101/813220 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Slow developing complex diseases are a clinical diagnostic challenge. Since genetic information is increasingly available prior to a patients first visit to a clinic, it might improve diagnostic accuracy. We aimed to devise a method to convert genetic information into simple probabilities discriminating between multiple diagnoses in patients presenting with inflammatory arthritis.\n\nWe developed G-Prob, which calculates for each patient the genetic probability for each of multiple possible diseases. We tested this for inflammatory arthritis-causing diseases (rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, spondyloarthropathy, psoriatic arthritis and gout). After validating in simulated data, we tested G-Prob in biobank cohorts in which genetic data were linked to electronic medical records: - 1,200 patients identified by ICD-codes within the eMERGE database (n= 52,623);\n- 245 patients identified through ICD codes and review of medical records within the Partners Biobank (n=12,604);\n- 243 patients selected prospectively with final diagnoses by medical record review within the Partners Biobank (n=12,604).\nThe calibration of G-Prob with the disease status was high (with regression coefficients ranging from 0.90-1.08 (ideal would be 1.00) in all cohorts. G-Probs discriminative ability was high in all cohorts with pooled Area Under the Curve (AUC)=0.69 [95%CI 0.67-0.71], 0.81 [95%CI 0.76-0.84] and 0.84 [95%CI 0.81-0.86]. For all patients, at least one disease could be ruled out, and in 45% of patients a most likely diagnosis could be identified with an overall 64% positive predictive value. In 35% of instances the clinicians initial diagnosis was incorrect. Initial clinical diagnosis explained 39% of the variance in final disease prediction which improved to 51% (P<0.0001) by adding G-Prob genetic data.\n\nIn conclusion, by converting genotypes into an interpretable probability value for five different inflammatory arthritides, we can better discriminate and diagnose rheumatic diseases. Genotypes available prior to a clinical visit could be considered part of patients medical history and potentially used to improve precision and diagnostic efficiency in clinical practice.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.