Structured internal cortical states deduced from fixed tactile input patterns
Norrlid, J.; Enander, J. M. D.; Mogensen, H.; Jorntell, H.
Show abstract
The brain has a never-ending internal activity, whose spatiotemporal evolution interacts with external inputs to define how we perceive them. We used reproducible touch-related spatiotemporal inputs and recorded intracellularly from rat neocortical neurons to characterise this interaction. The synaptic responses, or the summed input of the networks connected to the neuron, varied greatly to repeated presentations of the same tactile input pattern delivered to the tip of digit 2. Surprisingly, however, these responses sorted into a set of specific response types, unique for each neuron. Further, using a set of eight such tactile input patterns, we found each neuron to exhibit a set of specific response types for each input provided. Response types were not determined by global cortical state, but instead likely depended on the time-varying state of the specific subnetworks connected to each neuron. The fact that some types of responses were recurrent, i.e. more likely than others, indicates that the cortical network had a non-continuous landscape of solutions for these tactile inputs. Therefore, our data suggests that sensory inputs combine with the internal dynamics of the brain networks, thereby causing them to fall into one of multiple possible perceptual attractor states. The neuron-specific instantiations of response types we observed suggest that the subnetworks connected to each neuron represent different components of those attractor states. Our results indicate that the impact of cortical internal states on external inputs is substantially more richly resolvable than previously shown. Key points summaryO_LIIt is known that the internal state of the neocortical network profoundly impacts cortical neuronal responses to sensory input. C_LIO_LILittle is known of how the internal neocortical activity combines with a given sensory input to generate the response. C_LIO_LIWe used eight reproducible patterns of skin sensor activation and made intracellular recordings in neocortical neurons to explore the response variations in the specific subnetworks connected to each recorded neuron. C_LIO_LIWe found that each neuron exhibited multiple, specific recurring response types to the exact same skin stimulation pattern and that each given stimulation pattern evoked a unique set of response types. C_LIO_LIThe findings indicate a multi-structure internal state that combines with peripheral information to define cortical responses; we suggest this mechanism is a prerequisite for the formation of perception (and illusions) and indicates that the cortical networks work according to attractor dynamics. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Remote cortical perturbation dynamically changes the network solutions 1 to given tactile inputs in neocortical neurons 94%
- Temporal-Coherence Induces Binding in Responses to Sound Sequences in Ferret Auditory Cortex 94%
- High-Dimensional Encoding of Movement by Single Neurons in Basal Ganglia Output 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The causal role of the inferior temporal cortex in visual perception 95%
- Conserved structures of neural activity in sensorimotor cortex of freely moving rats allow cross-subject decoding 95%
- Neural geometry efficiently representing abstract form of value and modality in the primate basal ganglia 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Leveraging current steering and the biophysics of spike generation for cellular-resolution electrical stimulation of neurons 94%
- Enhanced sensory coding in mouse vibrissal and visual cortex through TRPA1 94%
- Modulation of somatosensory signal transmission in the primate cuneate nucleus during voluntary hand movement 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.