Back

Metabolic trade-offs hide unforeseen benefits of plasmids carriage

Reding Roman, R. C.

2019-10-18 evolutionary biology
10.1101/810259 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The link between fitness and reproduction rate is a central tenet in microbiology, and indeed evolutionary biology: Mutants reproducing faster than the dominant wild-type are favoured by selection, but otherwise the mutation is lost. This link was given by Ronald Fisher in 1930 under the assumption that fitness can only change through mutations that boost or hinder growth rate, whence the use of logarithms on growth data by experimentalists. Here I show that logarithms are highly sensitive to sampling times, resulting in fitness estimates that are not constant over the growth of bacterial cultures. This variability invalidates typical selection measurements, and unfit mutants can be co-maintained if they reach their equilibrium. And this is what I observed in competition assays between two Escherichia coli constructs, one of which harbours a non-transmissible plasmid that protects against tetracycline (pGW155B), without using the antibiotic. Despite growing 40% slower than its drug-sensitive counterpart, the construct harbouring the plasmid persisted throughout the competition. And, perhaps more importantly, maintained the plasmid. My study suggests that reliance on growth rate masks that selection on plasmid carriage may be stronger than previously thought--explaining the seemingly-paradoxical abundance of plasmids in nature.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.7%
2
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
7.0%
3
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 18%
6.4%
4
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 10%
5.3%
5
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 2%
5.2%
6
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.2%
7
Evolution Letters
85 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
8
Microbiology
65 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.1%
9
Molecular Biology and Evolution
542 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
10
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.0%
11
Biology Letters
76 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.0%
12
Current Biology
665 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.7%
13
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.3%
14
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.0%
15
ISME Communications
120 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
16
The ISME Journal
228 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
17
mBio
833 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.7%
18
BMC Biology
265 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
19
Antibiotics
34 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
20
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.4%
21
Evolution
225 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
22
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.3%
23
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
72 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
24
mSystems
394 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
25
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
110 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
26
Ecology Letters
135 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
27
PLOS Pathogens
820 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.9%
28
Open Biology
106 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
29
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
30
GENETICS
483 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%