Feature selection for the classification of fall-risk in older subjects: a combinational approach using static force-plate measures
O'Reilly, D.
Show abstract
IntroductionFeature selection prevents over-fitting in predictive models. This study aimed to present an effective feature selection method that leads to a reliable classification of fall-risk in older subjects using static force-platform data across four conditions only.\n\nMethod528 features were generated from a publicly available dataset of force-plate signals from 45 low-risk and 28 high-risk subjects. Subjects were classified as high- or low-risk if they recorded [≥]1 falls in the prior 12 months and/or were rated as high-risk on the FES. The feature selection protocol included SVM-RFE, GA and ReliefF and finally SAFE. Several machine-learning models were then used to evaluate classification performance.\n\nResults67 features were identified after the three-fold process which was further reduced to 18 features after SAFE. The MLP achieved the highest average classification accuracy of 80%. All classification models evaluating this final subset displayed high variance across all performance metrics, especially in terms of sensitivity to high-risk subjects.\n\nInterpretationAn optimal feature set of static force-plate measures was insufficient in creating a reliable classifier of fall-risk. This was due potentially to the limited information about fall-risk that could be provided by such measures leading to under-fitting/over-fitting being unavoidable and appeared to be centered around an insensitivity to high-risk subjects.\n\nConclusionStatic stability measures have shown some usability in fall-risk classification however feature sets limited to such measures are inadequately sensitive to high-risk subjects. The utilized feature selection methods demonstrated their ability to identify relevant stability measures and could be used successfully on dynamic measures.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Using a Motion Sensor to Categorize Low Back Pain Patients: A Machine Learning Approach 96%
- Validity and reliability of inertial measurement units in active range of motion assessment in the hip joint 95%
- Validity and reliability of Kinect v2 for quantifying upper body kinematics during seated reaching 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Validation of a smartphone embedded inertial measurement unit for measuring postural stability in older adults 96%
- The Investigation of Nonlinear Variability Underlying Postural Control in The Injure-Limb in Individuals with and without Chronic Ankle Instability 96%
- Slow walking synergies reveal a functional role for arm swing asymmetry in healthy adults: a principal component analysis with relation to mechanical work. 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Muscle activity of cutting manoeuvres and soccer inside passing suggests an increased groin injury risk during these movements 95%
- Proprioceptive and visual motion detection acuity contribute to children dynamic postural control 95%
- The Ramp protocol: Uncovering individual differences in walking to an auditory beat using TeensyStep 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Objective turning measures improve diagnostic accuracy and relate to real-world mobility/combat readiness in chronic mild traumatic brain injury 92%
- Tracking white and grey matter degeneration along the spinal cord axis in degenerative cervical myelopathy 87%
- Natural Progression of Routine Laboratory Markers following Spinal Trauma: A Longitudinal, Multi-Cohort Study 87%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.