In vivo imaging defines vascular interplay in the development of lymphocytic leukemia in zebrafish models
Revskoy, S.; Blair, M. E.; Powell, S. M.; Hausman, E. S.; Blackburn, J. S.
Show abstract
The vascular microenvironment at the primary tumor site is represented by functionally diverse types of vessels that contribute to metabolic supply, trafficking/dissemination of tumor cells, and delivery of chemotherapeutics. However, the role of leukemia-associated vascular networks in leukemia progression remains poorly understood. We utilized a MYC-induced T cell leukemia model in zebrafish to assess the involvement of vascular endothelial growth factor A-dependent (VEGFR2+), VEGFA-independent vasculature (VEGFR2-), and lymphatics in the initial stages of leukemia cell dissemination using intravital microscopy. Leukemogenesis underwent sequential progression, from initial successive emigration of single leukemic cells from the thymus towards the kidney marrow, followed by collective migration in a dorsal-lateral direction with scattered migration from the ventral thymus towards the aortic arches, before streaming towards the rostral kidney area. Trafficking appeared independent of VEGFR2+ vasculature but was closely associated with VEGFR2-microvessels, and, interestingly, leukemic cells did not utilize lymphatics during initial dissemination. Overall, leukemic cells appeared to utilize the same routes as normal T cell progenitors during development but in a reverse order, and primarily recruited VEGFR2-microvessels during the initial stages of progression. Ultimately, interfering with leukemia cell migration by targeting vascular networks may represent a new therapeutic strategy to control leukemia progression.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Colony stimulating factor 1 signaling regulates myeloid fates in zebrafish via distinct action of its receptors and ligands 93%
- Zebrafish Kit ligands cooperate with erythropoietin to promote erythroid cell expansion 93%
- The bone marrow niche and hematopoietic system are distinctly remodeled by CD45-targeted astatine-211 radioimmunotherapy 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Renal cancer cells acquire immune surface protein through trogocytosis and horizontal gene transfer 92%
- Loss-of-function of Fbxo10, encoding a post-translational regulator of BCL2 in lymphomas, has no discernible effect on BCL2 or B lymphocyte accumulation in mice 92%
- Increased collective migration correlates with germline stem cell competition in a basal chordate 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The CNS Microenvironment Promotes Leukemia Cell Survival by Disrupting Tumor Suppression and Cell Cycle Regulation in Pediatric T-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia 92%
- Hexapeptide induces M2 macrophage polarization via the JAK1/STAT6 pathway to promote angiogenesis in bone repair 88%
- The anti-apoptotic proteins Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL suppress Beclin1/Atg6-mediated lethal autophagy in polyploid cells 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- Analysis of receptor-ligand pairings and distribution of myeloid subpopulations across the animal kingdom reveals neutrophil evolution was facilitated by colony-stimulating factors. 94%
- RAG1 and RAG2 Non-core Regions Are Implicated in Leukemogenesis and Off-target V(D)J Recombination in BCR-ABL1-driven B-cell Lineage Lym-phoblastic Leukemia 92%
- The chromatin-remodeling enzyme Smarca5 regulates erythrocyte aggregation via Keap1-Nrf2 signaling 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- New C3H KitN824K/WT cancer mouse model develops late-onset malignant mammary tumors with high penetrance 91%
- Stratified computational meta-analysis of 2213 acute myeloid leukemia patients reveals age- and sex-dependent gene expression signatures 91%
- STAT5-dependent regulation of CDC25A by miR-16 controls proliferation and differentiation in FLT3-ITD acute myeloid leukemia 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.