The Effect of MR Image Quality on Structural and Functional Brain Connectivity: The Maastricht Study
de Jong, J. J. A.; Jansen, J. F. A.; Vergoossen, L. W. M.; Schram, M. T.; Stehouwer, C. D. A.; Wildberger, J. E.; Linden, D. E. J.; Backes, W. H.
Show abstract
In large population-based cohort studies, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is often used to study the structure and function of the brain. Advanced MRI techniques such as diffusion-tensor (dMRI) or resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI) can be used to study connections between distinct brain regions. However, brain connectivity measures are likely affected by biases introduced during MRI data acquisition and/or processing.\n\nWe identified three sources that may lead to bias, i.e. signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), head motion, and spatial mismatch between MRI-based anatomy and a brain atlas. After quantifying these sources, we determined the associations between the image quality metrics and brain connectivity measures derived from dMRI and rs-fMRI in 5,110 participants of the population-based Maastricht Study.\n\nMore head motion and low SNR were negatively associated with structural and functional brain connectivity, respectively, and these metrics substantially affected (>10%) associations of brain connectivity with age, sex and body mass index (BMI), whereas associations with diabetes status, educational level, history of cardiovascular disease, and white matter hyperintensities were less or not affected. In addition, age, sex, and BMI were associated with head motion, SNR, and atlas mismatch (all p < 0.001). Based on our results, we strongly advise that, in large population-based cohort neuroimaging studies, statistical analyses on structural and functional brain connectivity should adjust for potentially confounding effects of image quality.\n\nHighlightsO_LILow MR image quality compromises brain connectivity measures\nC_LIO_LIMR image quality is negatively associated with age, body mass index, and male sex\nC_LIO_LIStatistical analyses in large neuroimaging studies should account for image quality\nC_LI
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Effects of phase encoding direction on test-retest reliability of human functional connectome 98%
- Reliability of resting-state functional connectivity in the human spinal cord: assessing the impact of distinct noise sources 98%
- Toward A Connectivity Gradient-Based Framework For Reproducible Biomarker Discovery 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Typicality of Functional Connectivity robustly captures motion artifacts in rs-fMRI across datasets, atlases and preprocessing pipelines 97%
- Voxel-wise Intermodal Coupling Analysis of Two or More Modalities using Local Covariance Decomposition 97%
- Comparison of structural MRI brain measures between 1.5T and 3T: data from the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Test-Retest Reliability of Dynamic Functional Connectivity Parameters for a Two-State Model 98%
- Predicting MEG resting-state functional connectivity using microstructural information 97%
- The Motion Sensitivity and Predictive Utility of Different Estimates of Inter-regional Functional Coupling in Resting-state Functional MRI. 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Lumbosacral spinal cord functional connectivity at rest: From feasibility to reliability 97%
- Fast and reliable quantitative measures of white matter development with magnetic resonance fingerprinting 96%
- Functional magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbosacral cord during a lower extremity motor task 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.