Back

Traditional functional groups capture limited variation in the trait space of macroalgae

Mauffrey, A. R. L.; Cappelatti, L.; Griffin, J. N.

2019-10-16 ecology
10.1101/803965 bioRxiv
Show abstract

O_LIMacroalgal (seaweed) beds and forests fuel coastal ecosystems and are rapidly reorganising under global change, but quantifying their functional structure still relies on binning species into coarse groups on the assumption that they adequately capture relevant underlying traits.\nC_LIO_LITo interrogate this \"group gambit\", we first measured 12 traits relating to competitive dominance and resource economics across 95 macroalgal species collected from UK rocky shores. We then assessed trait variation explained by traditional grouping approaches consisting of (i) two highly-cited schemes based on gross morphology and anatomy and (ii) two commonly-used categorisations of vertical space use. To identify the limitations of traditional grouping approaches and to reveal potential alternatives, we also assessed the ability of (iii) emergent groups created from post hoc clustering of our dataset to account for macroalgal trait variation.\nC_LIO_LI(i) Traditional groups explained about a third of multivariate trait expression with considerable group overlap. (ii) Classifications of vertical space use accounted for even less multivariate trait expression. Notwithstanding considerable overlap, the canopy vs. turf scheme explained significant differences in most individual traits, with turf species tending to display attributes of opportunistic forms. (iii) Emergent groups were substantially more parsimonious than all existing grouping approaches.\nC_LIO_LISynthesis: Our analysis using a comprehensive dataset of directly measured functional traits failed to strongly support the group gambit in macroalgae. While existing grouping approaches may allow first order approximations, they risk considerable loss of information at the trait and, potentially, ecosystem levels. We call for further development of a trait-based approach to macroalgal functional ecology to capture unfolding community and ecosystem changes with greater accuracy and generality.\nC_LI

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.0%
2
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
8.9%
3
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.1%
4
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.7%
5
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 9%
3.8%
6
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.8%
7
Global Ecology and Biogeography
41 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
8
Ecosphere
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
9
Ecological Informatics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.7%
50% of probability mass above
11
Journal of Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
12
Ecological Applications
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
13
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.5%
14
Ecological Monographs
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
15
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.4%
16
Oikos
74 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
17
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 29%
2.0%
18
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.7%
19
Frontiers in Marine Science
55 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.6%
20
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
21
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 44%
1.6%
22
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.4%
23
Functional Ecology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
24
Ecology
70 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
25
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
26
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.3%
27
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 68%
1.1%
28
Diversity and Distributions
26 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
29
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
30
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%