The human sperm beats anisotropically and asymmetrically in 3D
Gadelha, H.; Hernandez-Herrera, P.; Montoya, F.; Darszon, A.; Corkidi, G.
Show abstract
The canonical beating of the human sperm flagellum is postulated to be symmetric. This is despite the reported asymmetries inherent to the flagellar axonemal structure, from distribution and activation of molecular motors to, even, the localisation of regulatory ion channels. This raises a fundamental question: how symmetric beating is possible within such intrinsically asymmetric flagellar complex? Here, we employ high-speed 3D imaging with mathematical analysis capable of resolving the flagellar movement in 4D (3D+time). This reveals that the human sperm beating is both anisotropic and asymmetric, and composed by a superposition of two transversal waves: an asymmetric travelling wave and a symmetric standing wave. This novel anisotropic travelling-pulsation mechanism induces sperm rolling self-organisation and causes a flagellar kinematic illusion, so that the beat appears to be symmetric if observed with 2D microscopy. The 3D beating anisotropy thus regularises the intrinsic flagellar asymmetry to achieve symmetric side-to-side movement and straight-line swimming.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- 3D single cell migration driven by temporal correlation between oscillating force dipoles 95%
- Epithelial cell chirality emerges through the dynamic concentric pattern of actomyosin cytoskeleton 94%
- Cellular coordination underpins rapid reversals in gliding filamentous cyanobacteria and its loss results in plectonemes 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Microscopic Chromosomal Structural and Dynamical Origin of Cell Differentiation and Reprogramming 93%
- Geometrically encoded positioning of introns, intergenic segments, and exons in the human genome 92%
- Information-Distilled Generative Label-Free Morphological Profiling Encodes Cellular Heterogeneity 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.