Back

Multi-scale spatial genetic structure of a vector-borne plant pathogen in orchards and wild habitat

Marie-Jeanne, V.; Bonnot, F.; Thebaud, G.; Peccoud, J.; Labonne, G.; Sauvion, N.

2019-10-07 ecology
10.1101/795096 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Inferring the dispersal processes of vector-borne plant pathogens is a great challenge because the plausible epidemiological scenarios often involve complex spread patterns at multiple scales. European stone fruit yellows (ESFY), a disease caused by Candidatus Phytoplasma prunorum and disseminated via planting material and vectors belonging to the species Cacopsylla pruni, is a major threat for stone fruit production throughout Europe. The spatial genetic structure of the pathogen was investigated at multiple scales by the application of a combination of statistical approaches to a large dataset obtained through the intensive sampling of the three ecological compartments hosting the pathogen (psyllids, wild and cultivated Prunus) in three Prunus-growing regions in France. This work revealed new haplotypes of Ca. P. prunorum, and showed that the prevalence of the different haplotypes of this pathogen is highly uneven between all regions, and within two of them. In addition, we identified a significant clustering of similar haplotypes within a radius of at most 50 km, but not between nearby wild and cultivated Prunus. We also provide evidence that the two species of the C. pruni complex are unevenly distributed but can spread the pathogen, and that infected plants are transferred between production areas. Altogether, this work supports a main epidemiological scenario where Ca. P. prunorum is endemic in, and mostly acquired from, wild Prunus by immature C. pruni (of both species) who then migrate to \"shelter plants\" that epidemiologically connect sites less than 50 km apart by later providing infectious mature C. pruni to their \"migration basins\", which differ in their haplotypic composition. We argue that such multiscale studies would be very useful for other pathosystems.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
40.1%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 6%
10.3%
50% of probability mass above
3
Plant Pathology
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.9%
5
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.6%
6
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
7
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
8
Insects
36 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
9
Plant Disease
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
10
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
11
Ecological Modelling
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
12
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.7%
13
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 42%
1.7%
14
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.5%
15
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
16
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
17
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
18
Transboundary and Emerging Diseases
34 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
19
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
20
Phytopathology®
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
21
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
22
One Health
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
23
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
24
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.7%
25
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
26
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.7%
27
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
28
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.5%
29
Basic and Applied Ecology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%