Introducing ExHiBITT - Exploring Host microbiome inTeractions in Twins-, a colon multiomic cohort study
Mora-Ortiz, M.; Ibraheim, H.; Hermangild Kottoor, S.; Bowyer, R.; Metrustry, S.; Sanderson, J.; Powell, N.; Spector, T. D.; Small, K. S.; Steves, C. J.
Show abstract
The colon is populated by approximately 1012 microorganisms, but the relationships between this microbiome and the host health status are still not completely understood. Participants from the TwinsUK cohort were recruited to study the interactions between the microbiome and host adaptive immunity. In total, 205 monozygotic twins were recruited from the wider TwinsUK cohort. They completed health questionnaires, and provided saliva, blood, colon biopsies from three different locations, caecal fluid, and two faecal-samples.\n\nHere, our objective is to present the cohort characteristics of ExHiBITT including i) biomedical phenotypes, ii) environmental factors and ii) colonoscopic findings. A significant proportion of this apparently normal cohort had colonic polyps (28%), which are of interest as potential precursors of colorectal cancer, and as expected, the number of polyps found was significantly correlated with BMI and age. Hitherto undiagnosed diverticulosis was also not infrequently found during colonoscopy (26%) and was associated in changes in Hybrid Th1-17 cells in the colon. Twin proband cooccurrence rate for diverticulosis (82%), was much higher than for polyps (42%). Familial factors affecting morphology or tolerance may contribute to the ease of endoscopy, as both the time to reach the caecum, and pain perceived were highly concordant (proband concordance: 85% and 56% respectively). We found the expected positive relationship between BMI and colonoscopic anomalies such as diverticular disease and polyps in the whole population, but within twin pairs this association was reversed. This suggests that familial factors confound these associations. Host and microbial Next Generation Sequencing and metabolomics of the samples collected are planned in this cohort.
Matching journals
The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Microbiota-Short Chain Fatty Acid Relationships and Microbial Substrate Preferences Vary Across the Spectrum of Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) 93%
- Exploring the causal role of the human gut microbiome in endometrial cancer: a Mendelian randomization approach 92%
- Linking Gene Expression to Clinical Outcomes in Pediatric Crohn's Disease Using Machine Learning 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Ability of known colorectal cancer susceptibility SNPs to predict colorectal cancer risk: A cohort study within the UK Biobank 94%
- Dietary cystine restriction increases the proliferative capacity of the small intestine of mice 94%
- A Multi-Mineral Intervention To Improve Disease-Related And Mechanistic Biomarkers In Ulcerative Colitis Patients 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- All thresholds of maternal hyperglycaemia from the WHO 2013 criteria for gestational diabetes identify women with a higher genetic risk for type 2 diabetes 88%
- Maternal and child immune profiles are associated with neurometabolite measures of early-life neuroinflammation in children who are HIV-exposed and uninfected: a South African birth cohort 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- A hepatocyte-specific transcriptional program driven by Rela and Stat3 exacerbates experimental colitis in mice by modulating bile synthesis 92%
- Organoid-derived Duodenum Intestine-Chip for preclinical drug assessment in a human relevant system 92%
- Rab7 dependent regulation of goblet cell protein CLCA1 modulates gastrointestinal homeostasis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Molecular pathways in post-colonoscopy versus detected colorectal cancers: results from a nested case-control study 93%
- Quantitative faecal immunochemical test for patients with high risk bowel symptoms: a prospective cohort study 92%
- Probing the diabetes and colorectal cancer relationship using gene – environment interaction analyses 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.