Back

A Machine Learning Approach to Predict Hypotensive Events in ICU Settings

Chookhachizadeh Moghadam, M.; Masoumi, E.; Bagherzadeh, N.; Ramsingh, D.; Li, G.-P.; Kain, Z. N.

2019-10-07 bioengineering
10.1101/794768 bioRxiv
Show abstract

PurposePredicting hypotension well in advance provides physicians with enough time to respond with proper therapeutic measures. However, the real-time prediction of hypotension with high positive predictive value (PPV) is a challenge due to the dynamic changes in patients physiological status under the drug administration which is limiting the amount of useful data available for the algorithm.\n\nMethodsTo mimic real-time monitoring, we developed a machine learning algorithm that uses most of the available data points from patients record to train and test the algorithm. The algorithm predicts hypotension up to 30 minutes in advance based on only 5 minutes of patients physiological history. A novel evaluation method is proposed to assess the algorithm performance as a function of time at every timestamp within 30 minutes prior to hypotension. This evaluation approach provides statistical tools to find the best possible prediction window.\n\nResultsDuring 181,000 minutes of monitoring of about 400 patients, the algorithm demonstrated 94% accuracy, 85% sensitivity and 96% specificity in predicting hypotension within 30 minutes of the events. A high PPV of 81% obtained and the algorithm predicted 80% of the events 25 minutes prior to their onsets. It was shown that choosing a classification threshold that maximizes the F1 score during the training phase contributes to a high PPV and sensitivity.\n\nConclusionThis study reveals the promising potential of the machine learning algorithms in real-time prediction of hypotensive events in ICU setting based on short-term physiological history.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.