Amitosis confers benefits of sex in the absence of sex to Tetrahymena
Zhang, H.; West, J. A.; Zufall, R. A.; Azevedo, R. B. R.
Show abstract
Sex appears to be the most successful reproductive strategy in eukaryotes despite its many costs. While a complete explanation for sexs success remains elusive, several evolutionary benefits of sex have been identified. It is predicted that, by forgoing these benefits, asexual lineages are evolutionary dead-ends. Consistent with this prediction, many asexual lineages show signs of accelerated accumulation of deleterious mutations compared to their sexual relatives. Despite these low expectations, some asexual eukaryotic lineages appear to be successful, including the ciliate Tetrahymena. Here, we show that the mechanism of somatic nuclear division in Tetrahymena, known as amitosis, provides benefits similar to sex, allowing for the long-term success of asexual lineages. We found that, when compared to mitosis, amitosis with chromosome copy number control reduces mutation load deterministically, slows the accumulation of deleterious mutations under genetic drift, and accelerates adaptation. These benefits arise because, like sex, amitosis can generate substantial genetic variation in fitness among (asexual) progeny. Our results indicate that the ability of Tetrahymena to persist in the absence of sex may depend on non-sexual genetic mechanisms conferring benefits typically provided by sex, as has been found in other asexual lineages.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- How does the strength of selection influence genetic correlations ? 97%
- Which cues are sexy? The evolution of mate preference in sympatric species reveals the contrasted effect of adaptation and reproductive interference. 96%
- Hybridization enables the fixation of selfish queen genotypes in eusocial colonies 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.