Cortico-striatal synaptic plasticity underlying compulsive reward seeking
Harada, M.; Hiver, A.; Pascoli, V.; Lüscher, C.
Show abstract
Addicted individuals compulsively seek drugs. Cortico-striatal projections have been implicated in persevering to seek rewards even when punished. The temporo-spatial determinants of the activity underlying the compulsive reward seeking however remains elusive. Here we trained mice in a seek-take chain, rewarded by optogenetic dopamine neuron self-stimulation (oDASS). Mice that persevered when seeking was punished, exhibited an increased AMPA/NMDA ratio selectively at orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) to dorsal striatum (DS) synapses. In addition, an activity peak of spiny projection neurons (SPNs) in the DS at the moment of signalled reward availability was detected. Chemogenetic inhibition of OFC neurons curbed the activity peak and reduced punished reward seeking, as did optogenetic hyperpolarization of SPNs time locked to the cue predicting reward availability, establishing a causal link. Taken together, we conclude that the strengthening of OFC-DS synapses drives SPNs activity when a reward predictive cue is delivered, thus encouraging reward seeking in subsequent trials.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- USP7/Maged1-Mediated H2A Monoubiquitination in the Paraventricular Thalamus: An Epigenetic Mechanism Involved in Cocaine Use Disorder 98%
- Dentate Gyrus Norepinephrine Ramping Facilitates Aversive Contextual Processing 98%
- Prediction error signals in anterior cingulate cortex drive task-switching 98%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Striatal dopamine integrates cost, benefit and motivation 98%
- Transcriptional control of nucleus accumbens neuronal excitability by Retinoid X Receptor Alpha tunes sensitivity to drug rewards 98%
- Ventral frontostriatal circuitry mediates the computation of reinforcement from symbolic gains and losses 97%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.