Back

Decoding the neural dynamics of oculomotor decision making in humans

Thiery, T.; Saive, A.-L.; Combrisson, E.; Dehgan, A.; Bastin, J.; Kahane, P.; Berthoz, A.; Lachaux, J.-P.; Jerbi, K.

2019-10-01 neuroscience
10.1101/788091 bioRxiv
Show abstract

How do we choose a particular action among equally valid alternatives? Non-human primate findings have shown that decision-making implicates modulations in unit firing rates and local field potentials (LFPs) across frontal and parietal cortices. Yet the electrophysiological brain mechanisms that underlie free choice in humans remain ill defined. Here, we address this question using rare intracerebral EEG recordings in surgical epilepsy patients performing a delayed oculomotor decision task. We find that the temporal dynamics of high gamma (HG, 60-140 Hz) neural activity in distinct frontal and parietal brain areas robustly discriminate free choice from instructed saccade planning at the level of single trials. Classification analysis was applied to the LFP signals to isolate decision-related activity from sensory and motor planning processes. Compared to instructed saccades, free choice trials exhibited delayed and longer-lasting HG activity. The temporal dynamics of these sustained decision-related responses distinguished deliberation-related from working memory processes. Taken together, these findings provide the first direct electrophysiological evidence in humans for the role of sustained high-frequency neural activation in fronto-parietal cortex in mediating the intrinsically driven process of freely choosing among competing behavioral alternatives. HighlightsO_LIFirst intracerebral recordings in humans performing an oculomotor decision-making task C_LIO_LIMachine learning analytics unravel underlying spectral and temporal brain dynamics C_LIO_LIFree choice trials exhibit sustained fronto-parietal high gamma (HG) activity during the delay C_LIO_LIMaking a decision and maintaining it in working memory are associated with distinct sustained HG dynamics C_LI

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 2%
12.4%
2
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 1%
11.4%
3
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 11%
9.4%
4
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 2%
7.6%
5
Progress in Neurobiology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.6%
6
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 25%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
7
Cerebral Cortex
396 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.0%
8
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.1%
9
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 11%
3.9%
10
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.4%
11
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 8%
3.1%
12
Journal of Neurophysiology
302 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
13
Nature Human Behaviour
95 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.0%
14
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
15
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 49%
2.0%
16
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.0%
17
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.8%
18
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
135 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
19
Journal of Neural Engineering
221 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
20
Neuron
337 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
21
Cerebral Cortex Communications
36 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
22
European Journal of Neuroscience
189 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
23
Human Brain Mapping
329 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
24
Current Biology
665 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.6%