Back

Detection of AmpC β-lactamases in Escherichia coli using different screening agars

den Drijver, E.; Verweij, J. J.; Verhulst, C.; Soer, J.; Veldman, K.; Rossen, J. W.; Kooista-Smit, M. A. M. D.; Kluytmans - van den Bergh, M. F. Q.; Kluytmans, J. A. J. W.

2019-09-30 microbiology
10.1101/787085 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the performance of both cefotaxime and ceftazidime containing agars on the specificity and sensitivity for chromosomal AmpC-hyperproducing and plasmid AmpC harboring Escherichia coli compared to ESBL-producing E. coli and E. coli without ESBL, pAmpC or cAmpC hyperproduction. Second, we evaluated the influence of adding cefoxitin to these agars for detection of both chromosomal AmpC-hyperproducing and plasmid AmpC harboring E. coli.\n\nFour different homemade screening agars with cefotaxime (1mg/L), ceftazidime (1mg/L), cefotaxime (1mg/L) with cefoxitin (8mg/L), and ceftazidime (1mg/L) with cefoxitin (8mg/L) were compared to each other for the identification of AmpC producing E. coli. A total of 40 isolates with plasmid encoded AmpC {beta}-lactamases, 40 isolates with alterations in the promoter/attenuator region of the AmpC gene leading to hyperproduction of the {beta}-lactamase, 40 isolates with ESBL genes and 39 isolates lacking both a AmpC and ESBL genotype were used to test the four agars.\n\nThe sensitivity and specificity were 100% (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 96.1% to 100%) and 48.1% (95% CI 38.6%-60.2%), respectively, for the cefotaxime agar; 100% (95% CI 96.1% to 100%) and 49.41% (95% CI 39.8%-61.4%), respectively, for the ceftazidime agar; 96.3% (95% CI 89.1% to 99.2%) and 77.2% (95% CI 66.7%-85.2%) respectively, for the cefotaxime with cefoxitin agar; 98.8% (95% CI) 92.6% to 99.6%) and 81.0% (95% CI 70.9%-88.3%) respectively, for the ceftazidime agar with cefoxitin. The main reason for false-positive results were ESBL-harboring strains that grew on various agars; therefore, the specificity of each agar reported here was influenced mainly by the proportion of ESBL isolates tested. In conclusion addition of cefoxitin to cefotaxime and ceftazidime containing agars had little influence on sensitivity, but increased specificity for the detection of AmpC in E. coli.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.1%
2
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.8%
3
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
167 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.2%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.2%
5
Journal of Applied Microbiology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.1%
6
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.5%
8
Journal of Medical Microbiology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
9
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.0%
10
Antibiotics
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.5%
11
Journal of Microbiological Methods
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.3%
12
JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.3%
13
Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
14
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.6%
15
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
16
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
17
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
18
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.4%
19
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
20
International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
21
Journal of Clinical Virology
62 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
22
Journal of Hospital Infection
27 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
23
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
25
BMC Microbiology
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
26
MicrobiologyOpen
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
27
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
28
Microbiology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
29
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
30
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%