Back

Crystal structure of β-arrestin 2 in complex with an atypical chemokine receptor phosphopeptide reveals an alternative active conformation

Min, K.; Yoon, H.-J.; Park, J. Y.; Baidya, M.; Dwivedi, H.; Maharana, J.; Chung, K. Y.; Shukla, A. K.; Lee, H. H.

2019-09-29 biochemistry
10.1101/785527 bioRxiv
Show abstract

{beta}-arrestins ({beta}arrs) critically regulate signaling and trafficking of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), the largest family of drug targets in the human genome, and there are two isoforms of {beta}arrs: {beta}arr1 and {beta}arr2. Most GPCRs interact with both the heterotrimeric G-proteins and {beta}arrs, inducing distinct downstream signal transduction. However, certain chemokine receptors lack functional G-protein coupling, but they can efficiently recruit {beta}arrs upon agonist-stimulation, and they are referred to as atypical chemokine receptors (ACKRs). Receptor phosphorylation is a key determinant for the binding of {beta}arrs, and understanding the intricate details of receptor-{beta}arr interaction is the next frontier in GPCR structural biology. To date, the high-resolution structures of active {beta}arr1 have been revealed, but the activation mechanism of {beta}arr2 by a phosphorylated GPCR remains elusive. Here, we present a 1.95 [A] crystal structure of {beta}arr2 in complex with a phosphopeptide (C7pp) derived from the carboxyl-terminus of ACKR3, also known as CXCR7. The structure of C7pp-bound {beta}arr2 reveals key differences from the previously determined active conformation of {beta}arr1. One of the key differences is that C7pp-bound {beta}arr2 shows a relatively small inter-domain rotation. An antibody-fragment-based conformational sensor and hydrogen/deuterium exchange experiments further corroborate structural features and suggest that the determined structure is an alternative active conformation of {beta}arr2.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.