Back

Selection-based model of prokaryote pangenomes

Domingo-Sananes, M. R.; McInerney, J.

2019-09-25 microbiology
10.1101/782573 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The genomes of different individuals of the same prokaryote species can vary widely in gene content, displaying different proportions of core genes, which are present in all genomes, and accessory genes, whose presence varies between genomes. Together, these core and accessory genes make up a species pangenome. The reasons behind this extensive diversity in gene content remain elusive, and there is an ongoing debate about the contribution of accessory genes to fitness, that is, whether their presence is on average advantageous, neutral, or deleterious. In order to explore this issue, we developed a mathematical model to simulate the gene content of prokaryote genomes and pangenomes. Our model focuses on testing how the fitness effects of genes and their rates of gene gain and loss would affect the properties of pangenomes. We first show that pangenomes with large numbers of low-frequency genes can arise due to the gain and loss of neutral and nearly neutral genes in a population. However, pangenomes with large numbers of highly beneficial, low-frequency genes can arise as a consequence of genotype-by-environment interactions when multiple niches are available to a species. Finally, pangenomes can arise, irrespective of the fitness effect of the gained and lost genes, as long as gene gain and loss rates are high. We argue that in order to understand the contribution of different mechanisms to pangenome diversity, it is crucial to have empirical information on population structure, gene-by-environment interactions, the distributions of fitness effects and rates of gene gain and loss in different prokaryote groups.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.