Neurocognitive development of inhibitory control and substance use vulnerability
Quach, A.; Tervo-Clemmens, B.; Foran, W.; Calabro, F.; Chung, T.; Clark, D.; Luna, B.
Show abstract
Previous research indicates that risk for substance use is associated with poor inhibitory control. However, it remains unclear whether at risk youth use follow divergent patterns of inhibitory control development. As part of the longitudinal National Consortium on Adolescent Neurodevelopment and Alcohol (NCANDA) study, participants (N = 113, baseline age: 12-21) completed a rewarded antisaccade task during fMRI, with up to three time points. We examined whether substance use risk factors, including dimensional measures of psychopathology (externalizing, internalizing) and family history of substance use disorder, were associated with developmental differences in inhibitory control performance and BOLD activation at both the trial-level and within individual antisaccade epochs (cue, preparation, and response). Among substance use risk factors, only externalizing psychopathology predicted developmental differences in inhibitory control, where high externalizing predicted lower correct response rates and faster latencies were observed in early adolescence, but normalized by late adolescence. Neuroimaging results revealed high externalizing was associated with developmentally-stable hypo-activation in the left middle frontal gyrus (trial-level), but divergent developmental patterns of posterior parietal cortex activation (cue epoch). Developmental differences in inhibitory control associated with externalizing suggest early adolescence may be a unique period of substance use vulnerability via cognitive and phenotypic disinhibition.\n\nHighlightsO_LICharacterized inhibitory control development in adolescents at-risk for substance use.\nC_LIO_LIExternalizing psychopathology is associated with lower antisaccade correct response rate and faster latencies in early adolescence.\nC_LIO_LIExternalizing performance differences normalize by late adolescence.\nC_LIO_LIExternalizing is associated with prefrontal hypo-activation across development.\nC_LIO_LIExternalizing moderates age-related increases in posterior parietal cortex activity.\nC_LI
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Lower neural value signaling in the prefrontal cortex is related to childhood family income and depressive symptomatology during adolescence 96%
- Puberty contributes to adolescent development of fronto-striatal functional connectivity supporting inhibitory control 95%
- Integrating Multilevel, Multidomain and Multimodal Neuroimaging Factors to Predict Early Alcohol Exposure Trajectories Using Explainable AI 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Associations Between Polygenic Scores for Cognitive and Non-cognitive Factors of Educational Attainment and Measures of Behavior, Psychopathology, and Neuroimaging in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study 95%
- Impulsive adolescents exhibit inefficient processing and a low decision threshold when decoding facial expressions of emotions 95%
- Corticolimbic connectivity mediates the relationship between pubertal timing and mental health problems 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The neural signature of impaired inhibitory control in individuals with heroin use disorder 96%
- Model-based learning deficits in compulsivity are linked to faulty representations of task structure 94%
- Prefrontal responses during proactive and reactive inhibition are differentially impacted by stress in anorexia and bulimia nervosa 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Resting-state network topology characterizing callous-unemotional traits in adolescence 95%
- Structural Brain Alterations and Their Association with Cognitive Function and Symptoms in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Families 94%
- Brain Anatomical Covariation Patterns Linked to Binge Drinking and Age at First Full Drink Prior to 21 Years 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.