Hue tuning curves in V4 change with visual context
Benjamin, A. S.; Ramkumar, P.; Fernandes, H.; Smith, M. A.; Kording, K. P.
Show abstract
Neurons are often probed by presenting a set of stimuli that vary along one dimension (e.g. color) and quantifying how this stimulus property affect neural activity. An open question, in particular where higher-level areas are involved, is how much tuning measured with one stimulus set reveals about tuning to a new set. Here we ask this question by estimating tuning to hue in macaque V4 from a set of natural scenes and a set of simple color stimuli. We found that hue tuning was strong in each dataset but was not correlated across the datasets, a finding expected if neurons have strong mixed selectivity. We also show how such mixed selectivity may be useful for transmitting information about multiple dimensions of the world. Our finding suggest that tuning in higher visual areas measured with simple stimuli may thus not generalize to naturalistic stimuli. New & NoteworthyVisual cortex is often investigated by mapping neural tuning to variables selected by the researcher such as color. How much does this approach tell us a neurons general role in vision? Here we show that for strongly hue-tuned neurons in V4, estimating hue tuning from artificial stimuli does not reveal the hue tuning in the context of natural scenes. We show how models of optimal information processing suggest that such mixed selectivity maximizes information transmission.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Non-preferred contrast responses in the Drosophila motion pathways reveal a receptive field structure that explains a common visual illusion 96%
- State and stimulus dependence reconcile motion computation and the Drosophila connectome 96%
- Monkeys engage in visual simulation to solve complex problems 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.