Back

Ecological stoichiometry and adult fat reserves suggest bet-hedging in Drosophila melanogaster development

Krama, T.; Krams, R.; Joers, P.; Munkevics, M.; Trakimas, G.; Luoto, S.; Eichler, S.; Butler, D. M.; Merivee, E.; Must, A.; Rantala, M. J.; Contreras-Garduno, J.; Krams, I.

2019-09-23 evolutionary biology
10.1101/780098 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The elemental composition of organisms relates to a suite of functional traits that change during development in response to environmental conditions. It may be a part of a phenomenon known as developmental programming, which hypothetically creates phenotypes that are better adapted to their environments. However, associations between developmental speed and elemental body composition are not well understood. We compared body mass, elemental body composition, food uptake and fat metabolism of Drosophila melanogaster Oregon-R male fruit flies across the time gradient of their larval development. The results showed that flies with intermediate and rapid developmental speeds were heavier than slowly developing flies. Slowly developing flies had higher body carbon concentration than rapidly developing and intermediate flies. Rapidly developing flies had the highest body nitrogen concentration, while slowly developing flies had higher body nitrogen levels than flies with intermediate speed of development. The carbon-to-nitrogen ratio was therefore lower in rapidly developing flies than in slow and intermediate flies. Feeding rates were lowest in the slowly developing flies. The amount of storage fats was highest in the intermediate group. This means that the growth of rapidly developing flies is not suppressed by stress and they actively convert the food they consume into growth with less emphasis on storage build-up, suggesting bet-hedging in the larval development. In contrast, flies in the intermediate developmental group had the greatest fat reserves which optimize fitness under many climatic conditions. Low food intake may slow down development and the accumulation of body fat reserves in slowly developing flies. However, at the cost of slower growth, their phenotype conceivably facilitates survival under higher stochasticity of their ephemeral environments spoiled by metabolic waste due to high density of conspecifics. Overall, this study suggests that bet-hedging may be a common developmental strategy in fruit flies to cope with environmental uncertainty.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.6%
2
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.6%
3
Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
4
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.9%
5
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
6
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
7
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.4%
8
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.0%
9
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.6%
11
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.7%
13
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
Functional Ecology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
15
Journal of Insect Physiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
16
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
17
Evolutionary Ecology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
18
Heredity
53 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
19
Journal of Thermal Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
20
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
Animal Behaviour
65 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
22
Open Biology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
24
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.8%
25
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
26
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
Evolution & Development
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
28
EvoDevo
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.7%
29
Insects
36 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
30
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.7%