A Suboptimal Model Explained the Spatiotemporal Control of Human Eye Movements in Visual Search
Zhou, Y.; Yu, Y.
Show abstract
Humans perform sequences of eye movements to search for a target in complex environment, but the efficiency of human search strategy is still controversial. Previous studies showed that humans can optimally integrate information across fixations and determine the next fixation location. However, their models ignored the temporal control of eye movement, ignored the limited human memory capacity, and the model prediction did not agree with details of human eye movement metrics well. Here, we measured the temporal course of human visibility map and recorded the eye movements of human subjects performing a visual search task. We further built a continuous-time eye movement model which considered saccadic inaccuracy, saccadic bias, and memory constraints in the visual system. This model agreed with many spatial and temporal properties of human eye movements, and showed several similar statistical dependencies between successive eye movements. In addition, our model also predicted that the human saccade decision is shaped by a memory capacity of around 8 recent fixations. These results suggest that human visual search strategy is not strictly optimal in the sense of fully utilizing the visibility map, but instead tries to balance between search performance and the costs to perform the task. Author SummaryDuring visual search, how do humans determine when and where to make eye movement is an important unsolved issue. Previous studies suggested that human can optimally use the visibility map to determine fixation locations, but we found that such model didnt agree with details of human eye movement metrics because it ignored several realistic biological limitations of human brain functions, and couldnt explain the temporal control of eye movements. Instead, we showed that considering the temporal course of visual processing and several constrains of the visual system could greatly improve the prediction on the spatiotemporal properties of human eye movement while only slightly affected the search performance in terms of median fixation numbers. Therefore, humans may not use the visibility map in a strictly optimal sense, but tried to balance between search performance and the costs to perform the task.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A linear perception-action mapping accounts for response range-dependent biases in heading estimation from optic flow 96%
- Visual perception of texture regularity: conjoint measurements and a wavelet response-distribution model 95%
- Human visual grouping based on within- and cross-area temporal correlations 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Tracking and perceiving diverse motion signals: Directional biases in human smooth pursuit and perception 95%
- The relationship between confidence and gaze-at-nothing oculomotor dynamics during decision-making 95%
- Did you see it? A Python tool for psychophysical assessment of the human blind spot 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.