Back

GSDMA drives the most replicated association with asthma in naïve CD4+ T cells

Madore, A.-M.; Pain, L.; Boucher-Lafleur, A.-M.; Meloche, J.; Morin, A.; Simon, M.-M.; Ge, B.; Kwan, T.; Cheung, W. A.; Pastinen, T.; Laprise, C.

2019-09-19 genetics
10.1101/774760 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe 17q12-21 locus is the most replicated association with asthma. However, no study had described the genetic mechanisms underlying this association considering all genes of the locus in immune cell samples isolated from asthmatic and non-asthmatic individuals.\n\nObjectiveThis study takes benefit of samples from naive CD4+ T cells and eosinophils isolated from the same 200 individuals to describe specific interactions between genetic variants, gene expression and DNA methylation levels for the 17q12-21 asthma locus.\n\nMethods and ResultsAfter isolation of naive CD4+ T cells and eosinophils from blood samples, next generation sequencing was used to measure DNA methylation levels and gene expression counts. Genetic interactions were then evaluated considering genetic variants from imputed genotype data. In naive CD4+ T cells but not eosinophils, 20 SNPs in the fourth and fifth haplotype blocks modulated both GSDMA expression and methylation levels, showing an opposite pattern of allele frequencies and expression counts in asthmatics compared to controls. Moreover, negative correlations have been measured between methylation levels of CpG sites located within the 1.5 kb region from the transcription start site of GSDMA and its expression counts.\n\nConclusionAvailability of sequencing data from two key cell types isolated from asthmatic and non-asthmatic individuals allowed identifying a new gene in naive CD4+ T cells that drives the association with the 17q12-21 locus, leading to a better understanding of the genetic mechanisms taking place in it.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.