Back

Vinculin targeting by Shigella IpaA promotes stable cell adhesion independent of mechanotransduction

Valencia-Gallardo, C.; Aguilar Salvador, D. I.; Khazad, H.; Bou-Nader, C.; Malosse, C.; Borges-Lima, D.; Bello, C.; Cocom-Chan, B.; Quenech'Du, N.; Mazhar, B.; Javelaud, D.; Fattaccioli, J.; Mauviel, A.; Fontecave, M.; Asnacios, A.; Chamot-Rooke, J.; Malmstrom, L.; Tran Van Nhieu, G.

2019-09-18 microbiology
10.1101/773283 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The Shigella effector IpaA co-opts the focal adhesion protein vinculin to promote bacterial invasion. Here, we show that IpaA triggers an unreported mode of vinculin activation through the cooperative binding of its three vinculin-binding sites (VBSs) leading to vinculin oligomerization via its D1 and D2 head subdomains and highly stable adhesions resisting actin relaxing drugs. Using cross-linking mass spectrometry, we found that while IpaA VBSs1-2 bound to D1, IpaA VBS3 interacted with D2, a subdomain masked to other known VBSs. Structural modeling indicated that as opposed to canonical activation linked to interaction with D1, these combined VBSs interactions triggered major allosteric changes leading to D1D2 oligomerization. A cysteine-clamp preventing these changes and D1D2 oligomerization impaired growth of vinculin microclusters and cell adhesion. We propose that D1D2-mediated vinculin oligomerization occurs during the maturation of adhesion structures to enable the scaffolding of high-order vinculin complexes, and is triggered by Shigella IpaA to promote bacterial invasion in the absence of mechanotransduction. SummaryThe Shigella IpaA effector binds to cryptic vinculin sites leading to oligomerization via its head domain. This vinculin oligomerization mode appears required for the maturation and strengthening of cell adhesion but is co-opted by invasive bacteria independent of actomyosin contractility.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.