How flat can a horse be? Exploring 2D approximations of 3D crania in equids
Cardini, A.; Chiappelli, M.
Show abstract
Quantitative analyses of morphological variation using geometric morphometrics are often performed on 2D photos of 3D structures. It is generally assumed that the error due to the flattening of the third dimension is negligible. However, despite hundreds of 2D studies, few have actually tested this assumption and none has done it on large animals, such as those typically classified as megafauna. We explore this issue in living equids, focusing on ventral cranial variation at both micro- and macro-evolutionary levels. By comparing 2D and 3D data, we found that size is well approximated, whereas shape is more strongly impacted by 2D inaccuracies, as it is especially evident in intra-specific analyses. The 2D approximation improves when shape differences are larger, as in macroevolution, but even at this level precise inter-individual similarity relationships are altered. Despite this, main patterns of sex, species and allometric variation in 2D were the same as in 3D, thus suggesting that 2D may be a source of noise that does not mask the main signal in the data. However, the problem is complex and any generalization premature. Morphometricians should therefore test the appropriateness of 2D using preliminary investigations in relation to the specific study questions in their own samples. We discuss whether this might be feasible using a reduced landmark configuration and smaller samples, which would save time and money. In an exploratory analysis, we found that in equids results seem robust to sampling, but become less precise and, with fewer landmarks, may slightly overestimate 2D inaccuracies.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Variation of tooth traits in ecologically specialized and sympatric morphs 93%
- Meta-analysis of behavioural research in lizards reveals that phylogeny and viviparity contribute better to animal personality than secretory glands 93%
- Seeing distinct groups where there are none: spurious patterns from between-group PCA 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of allometry on vomer shape and its implications for the taxonomy and cranial kinesis of crown-group birds 95%
- OH 89: A newly described ~1.8-million-year-old hominid clavicle from Olduvai Gorge 95%
- Spatio-temporal diversity of dietary preferences and stress sensibilities of early and middle Miocene Rhinocerotidae from Eurasia: impact of climate changes 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cracking the case: Differential adaptations to hard biting dominate cranial shape in rat-kangaroos (Potoroidae: Bettongia) with divergent diets. 95%
- The locomotor behavior of subfossil Malagasy sloth-lemurs (Strepsirrhini: Palaeopropithecidae) and koala-lemurs (Strepsirrhini: Megaladapidae): new insights from limb trabecular bone 93%
- In flagranti - Functional morphology of copulatory organs of odontopygid millipedes (Diplopoda: Juliformia: Spirostreptida) 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Lagomorph cranial biomechanics and the functional significance of the unique fenestrated rostrum of leporids 95%
- How smart was T. rex? Testing claims of exceptional cognition in dinosaurs and the application of neuron count estimates in palaeontological research 94%
- Growth patterns of theoretical bite force and jaw musculature in southern sea otters (Enhydra lutris nereis) 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A unique predator in a unique ecosystem: modelling the apex predator from the Late Cretaceous crocodyliform-dominated fauna in Brazil. 95%
- APPENDICULAR MORPHOLOGY AND LOCOMOTOR PERFORMANCE OF TWO MORPHOTYPES OF CONTINENTAL ANOLES: Anolis heterodermus AND Anolis tolimensis 93%
- Comparative anatomy and phylogenetic contribution of intracranial osseous canals and cavities in armadillos and glyptodonts (Xenarthra, Cingulata). 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.