Back

Viral host-range evolvability changes in response to fluctuating selection

Mouchka, M. E.; Dorsey, D. M.; Malcangio, G. L.; Medina, S. J.; Stuart, E. C.; Meyer, J. R.

2019-09-18 evolutionary biology
10.1101/771998 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The concept of evolvability (the capacity of populations to evolve) has deep historical roots in evolutionary biology. Interest in the subject has been renewed recently by innovations in microbiology that permit direct tests of the causes of evolvability, and with the acknowledgement that evolvability of pathogens has important implications for human health. Here, we investigate how fluctuating selection on the virus, Bacteriophage {lambda}, affects its evolvability. We imposed dynamic selection by altering the expression of two host outer membrane receptors. This, in turn, selected phage to alternately infect the host via a single, or multiple, receptors. Our selection regime resulted in two orthogonal evolutionary behaviors, namely enhanced or reduced evolvability. Strains with enhanced evolvability readily evolved between receptors, losing and gaining the ability to bind multiple receptors more quickly than the ancestral {lambda}. This suggests the receptor-binding protein retained a genetic memory of past states and that evolutionary history can be used to predict future adaptation. Strains with reduced evolvability were refractory to re-specialization and remained generalists on both receptors. Consistent with this behavior, unevolvable strains had reduced rates of molecular evolution in the receptor-binding protein compared to their evolvable counterparts. We found a single mutation in the receptor-binding protein was sufficient to render these strains resistant to evolution and did so by counteracting a receptor-binding trade-off associated with generalism. In this way, cost-free generalization allowed for reduced evolution and evolvability while maximizing success in both environments. Our results suggest the response to fluctuating selection is contingent and can lead to distinct differences in evolvability. These findings contribute to a growing understanding of the causes and consequences of evolvability and have important implications for infectious disease management.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
9.7%
2
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
8.1%
3
Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
4
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.1%
5
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 13%
6.1%
6
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.7%
7
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.8%
8
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.8%
9
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.8%
50% of probability mass above
10
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 9%
3.7%
11
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.4%
12
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 30%
2.9%
13
Virus Evolution
140 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.6%
14
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
15
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.0%
16
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
17
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.8%
18
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
19
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.6%
20
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
21
Journal of Virology
456 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
22
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
23
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
24
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
25
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
26
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.9%
27
Microbiology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
28
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
29
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.7%
30
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.7%