Back

Proteomic-based evaluation of nuclear transport of NLS-tagged trastuzumab-emtansine with enhanced cytotoxic potency.

Lacasse, V.; Beaudoin, S.; Jean, S.; Leyton, J.

2019-09-14 bioengineering
10.1101/769588 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Nuclear transport receptors (NTRs) are the only proteins able to transport large molecular weight payloads into the nucleus. A dominant area of molecular therapeutic research is the extension of the use of NTRs to target the nucleus for the development of pharmaceuticals or as tools for investigating fundamental biological questions. Although several examples of synthesized peptides harbouring nuclear localization signal (NLS) sequences conjugated to various payloads exist in the literature, the assumption has been that transport occurs by classical nuclear localization via the NTRs importin- and importin-{beta}. This assumption is relevant to nuclear-targeted therapeutics that aim for full potential clinical impact. In addition, fundamental research can benefit from unbiased approaches to investigate the role of NTRs. Herein, we report the construction of a novel NLS-modified agent composed of trastuzumab-emtansine (T-DM1) coupled to cell accumulator (Accum), a technology that enables monoclonal antibodies to escape endosome entrapment and accumulate conjugated payloads in the nucleus without abrogating affinity or specificity to target antigens. Accum harbours a classical NLS sequence from SV-40 large T-antigen. We demonstrate that routing T-DM1 to the nucleus successfully increased cytotoxic potency in the HER2-positive cell line SKBR3. More importantly, through the development of a novel bait-prey proteomic approach, we show that the non-classical NTR importin 7 and not importin-/importin-{beta} was required for the cytotoxicity effect. This result was validated by siRNA knock down. Our findings also indicate that by discovering an unanticipated NTR regulator of an NLS-modified agent, this study demonstrates the utility of combining an unbiased proteomic approach to probe NTR function in mammalian cell system and, is a foresight for future NLS-based development initiatives.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
ACS Chemical Biology
167 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.8%
2
RSC Chemical Biology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.7%
3
Cell Chemical Biology
94 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
4
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
158 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.9%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 30%
3.5%
6
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.4%
7
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
102 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.3%
8
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 10%
3.2%
9
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.1%
50% of probability mass above
10
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 40%
2.8%
11
Journal of Biological Chemistry
690 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.4%
12
Biochemical Journal
91 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
13
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
14
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.7%
15
ACS Omega
105 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
16
Science Signaling
65 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
17
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.1%
18
Analytical Chemistry
218 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
19
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.0%
20
Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
21
ACS Central Science
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
22
NAR Cancer
37 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
23
Nano Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
24
Life Science Alliance
285 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
25
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 41%
0.9%
26
Frontiers in Chemistry
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
27
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
53 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
28
ACS Nano
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
29
Molecular Pharmaceutics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
30
Small
78 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%