Does monetary reward increase visual working memory performance?
van den Berg, R.; Zou, Q.; Ma, W. J.
Show abstract
Previous work has shown that humans distribute their visual working memory (VWM) resources flexibly across items: the higher the importance of an item, the better it is remembered. A related, but much less studied question is whether people also have control over the total amount of VWM resource allocated to a task. Here, we approach this question by testing whether increasing monetary incentives results in better overall VWM performance. In three experiments, subjects performed a delayed-estimation task on the Amazon Turk platform. In the first two experiments, four groups of subjects received a bonus payment based on their performance, with the maximum bonus ranging from $0 to $10 between groups. We found no effect of the amount of bonus on intrinsic motivation or on VWM performance in either experiment. In the third experiment, reward was manipulated on a trial-by-trial basis using a within-subjects design. Again, no evidence was found that VWM performance depended on the magnitude of potential reward. These results suggest that encoding quality in visual working memory is insensitive to monetary reward, which has implications for resource-rational theories of VWM.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Temporal experience modifies future thoughts: Manipulation of Libet's W influences difficulty assessment during a decision-making task 95%
- Retrieval of a well-established skill is resistant to distraction: evidence from an implicit probabilistic sequence learning task 95%
- Demonstrating and disrupting well-learned habits 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.